Really "spinning" now - so both scales have "accuracy" capability of 0.1 grains. Set CM Lite to deliver 35.0 grains - could get a "true" weight of 34.9 to 35.1 grains delivered, within that "accuracy" range. Then, on to that Hornady beam scale - so a "light" one - true weight as 34.9 grains - could read 34.8 to 35.0 on the beam scale - its accuracy. Or a "heavy" one - true weight as 35.1 grains - could read 35.0 to 35.2 grains on that beam scale. So, set the CM Lite to 35.0 grains - within 0.1 grain accuracy on each scale, could read from 34.8 to 35.2 on the Hornady beam scale - 8 out of 10 throws did that. Very first two thrown from that CM did not.
Does not help me understand what is "drift" on a digital scale?
I had the same RCBS system some years ago and I studied the load accuracy in some detail. At first I was using a Sartorious 2 decimal place (in grains) balance to compare the values. That was quite a good balance at the time, then I later replaced that with a lab grade Vibra 3 decimal place (in grains) balance.
I found the accuracy of the RCBS system was actually about plus or minus .2 grains on a good day. I realized there was a considerable difference between the precise number displayed on the readout, and the actual weight of the powder charge.
Its actually even worse than that since it is automated. These automated systems will get you close enough for casual shooting but just wont cut it for competitions like F Class particularly at extended ranges. (if you expect to do well anyway)
For a while I just used the RCBS to throw the powder so I could fix it in the Vibra, then eventually realized the absurdity of it and sold off the RCBS.
Now I use an old school powder thrower from RCBS and then tune the load on the Vibra. To be honest, the load variance from the thrower isn't much worse than the RCBS, but certainly faster.
I would advise anyone to forget the expensive automated gadgetry and just spend your money on a more precise balance and a set of Lyman powder scoops.
I understand that may not be what you want to hear, but the reality is that by the time you realize your one decimal place scale has drifted, you are already easily off by at least .2 grains.
At least if you have a decent 2 decimal place scale (which is actually 5 times more accurate not ten times) it will be within about .04 grains. Thats about 2 kernels of Varget.
Now the Vibra balance is about 10 times better than that at about 0.004 grains, or within about a fifth kernel of Varget, but it is quite expensive.
You can break that powder charge accuracy down to feet per second if you want... 5 kernels of Varget is about 1/10th of a grain. So if your scale is only accurate to within 0.4 grains thats about 20 kernels of Varget.
Looking at the Nosler load data for 80 grain bullets for a 223, 24 grains of Varget gets 2553 FPS and 26 grains gets 2655, so the difference is 102 FPS for a 1 grain load difference.
Multiply that times 0.4 and you get a FPS change of 40.8 FPS with a variance of 0.4 grains of powder.
You can calculate what a 40 FPS velocity spread translates to in terms of drop at the distance of your choice to determine if it matters to you.
Considering that the target is round in F Class and widest along the horizontal center, maintaining a low vertical spread is the key to holding the widest part of the scoring ring. Vertical variance tend to leak out at 1:30 with the slightest wind error.
Last edited: