Dlask Tuff 22 25 round mags

6ohmoney

Regular
Rating - 100%
64   0   1
Well just thought I'd share my experience with these to save someone else the hassle. Buyer beware these things are junk!! My tuff 22 is a fabulous rifle that is full kid internals matched with a magpul hunter stock. Went with a dlask because of reviews and of course the fact that 25 round mags were available. Well after picking a couple up I could not get more then 3 rounds to feed in a row. Loaded full capability, tried 20, 15, all the same result. If the mag isn't loaded a specific way the top 5 rounds even flip upside down in the magazine. Maybe someone else can chime in for something I'm doing wrong but in all honesty I tried everything and have no desire to mess around filing and trying to fit something better that should work outta the package.
 
I just load them up the normal way, one at a time from the top.

If you want to do the quick way (paraphrasing from HC3R magazine load video)

1. pull load assist all the way down and lock.
2. put rib clip into magazine.
3 release load assist

To ensure alignment

1. Pull loading tab down
2. flip magazine over to let the rounds fall naturally to the feed lips
3. release loading tab.

Cartridges should be slightly nose up showing proper alignment.
 
Just stick with the original butler creek ones, though I prefer the 10 round rotaries with the trimag adaptor. More reliable :)
 
I have 6 "TUF" mags and two rifles and they run the full mag with out a single issue... zero failure to feeds. I have run them with many types of ammo and they have functioned perfectly with all. I currently run one with CCI Subsonic HP 40 grain and one with CCI Mini-Mag HP 36 grain... they run without a hiccup.
 
The Butler Creek 25 round mags are prohibited.

Not with a Tuf-22.

LSPx26Nl.jpg


pV8imdyl.jpg
 
Can confirm they are junk. Every once in a while I'll bring them out to "try again" or "try something different"...but no. They're crap, and you're better off buying a handful of oem mags.
 
I have 3 of those mags and they all work great. I did polish 2 of them on all the inside surfaces to slick up how the rounds move up but it is not necessary

One of my mags was DOA as it had a defect and the lips were too tight. it was replaced but I repaired it and it works now


the KEY is that you have to make sure the first round is up against the lips and the second round supports it. if the first round wiggles it will not feed. this happens easily when using the clips and if you make sure the rounds are in properly it feeds 100%
 
Not with a Tuf-22.

LSPx26Nl.jpg


pV8imdyl.jpg

So the mags have been modified to no longer fit a 10/22... since the mags were "intended" for the 10/22, has anyone tested the legality of this modification? It is not the same as pinning for a 10 round capacity.
 
So the mags have been modified to no longer fit a 10/22... since the mags were "intended" for the 10/22, has anyone tested the legality of this modification? It is not the same as pinning for a 10 round capacity.

Isn’t it? Since the RCMP “prohibition” of standard capacity 10/22 magazines is an opinion, this guy is of a different opinion, and none of it has ever been tested against a court; the RCMP have never charged anyone solely with possession of a prohibited device over a 10/22 magazine yet.

Their opinion isn’t in the criminal code or firearms act, nor is anything that declares that this is insufficient for modifying a magazine - in fact, this method IS blessed by the firearms act to reduce the capacity of a super illegal high capacity magazine down to a totally safe 5 or 10 round magazine, so if anything, I would say that his legal defence is robust.

Bradley
 
As stated above, loading is a learning curve, but once you figure it out, I have not had any issues. Yes, nothing will ever run exactly like the ruger OEM mags, but that should be expected. I'll really know come spring time though, when I finally get to take it to the gopher patch and really light it up!
 
I have had success loading these magazines but also have had frustrations which has cost me some gophers. My routine - with one loaded magazine in rifle, I start loading the empty magazine one at a time while I am scanning for gophers. I find it easy to do as designed to easily remove spring tension while loading. My arthritic hands appreciate not having to fight against the spring tension! Regarding functions - they work perfectly with no jamming.
 
Isn’t it? Since the RCMP “prohibition” of standard capacity 10/22 magazines is an opinion, this guy is of a different opinion, and none of it has ever been tested against a court; the RCMP have never charged anyone solely with possession of a prohibited device over a 10/22 magazine yet.

Their opinion isn’t in the criminal code or firearms act, nor is anything that declares that this is insufficient for modifying a magazine - in fact, this method IS blessed by the firearms act to reduce the capacity of a super illegal high capacity magazine down to a totally safe 5 or 10 round magazine, so if anything, I would say that his legal defence is robust.

Bradley

robust legal defense still costs $10000-$20000 even in case of success
 
Back
Top Bottom