I'm sure everyone would agree that there isn't much that can't be done with good shot placement and well constructed bullets. However, to what degree to people think that bigger calibres put animals on the ground quicker than smaller ones? Truthfully I don't do enough big game hunting to have a well experienced opinion on the issue; some prejudices maybe, but not enough experience.
No doubt, my current "go to gun", a Remington 700 .35 Whelen is a bigger hammer than the 7x57 Ruger 77 I was shooting ten years ago. I'm also sure that the7x57 will kill anything that I will ever shoot with the Whelen. Part of my reasoning with going for a larger calibre was that I want shorter trailing of animals with better blood trails. Assuming equally good shooting and good bullets in both how much is this achieved by using a bigger, more powerful round?
Chuck
No doubt, my current "go to gun", a Remington 700 .35 Whelen is a bigger hammer than the 7x57 Ruger 77 I was shooting ten years ago. I'm also sure that the7x57 will kill anything that I will ever shoot with the Whelen. Part of my reasoning with going for a larger calibre was that I want shorter trailing of animals with better blood trails. Assuming equally good shooting and good bullets in both how much is this achieved by using a bigger, more powerful round?
Chuck




















































