Do you have a Forster Co-ax Press?

[686 Shooter]

Then you may want a set of these link arms for it. These come from a fellow named Joshua Badeau in California. They were highly recommended on the Forster users Facebook page so I figured I'd give them a try. They weren't cheap, with how low our dollar is they came to around $100. But after installing these and using my press I think it was money well spent. They are very well made and they really open the work area of the press up so it's easier to get my big mitts in there. They also have a lug on the inside of them that stops travel at the same point that the lug on the handle assembly did when it contacted the old link arms, so your press' operation is exactly the same as before the change. I got hold of Joshua by messaging him over Facebook so if your interested in a set that's how you can reach him.

 

[6MT]

....

 

[aakoksal]

Are you happy with the press overall? Looking at these for some time, trying to decide if I should get one of these to replace my Redding Ultramag.

 

[GreenBob]

Are you happy with the press overall? Looking at these for some time, trying to decide if I should get one of these to replace my Redding Ultramag.

x2, initial impressions?

 

[sask378]

Thank you 686 Shooter for posting that. I didn't know those existed.

 

[nevanevan]

Are you happy with the press overall? Looking at these for some time, trying to decide if I should get one of these to replace my Redding Ultramag.

I had a newer Forster, I sold and replaced it with a Redding big boss 2. I am much happier with the Redding, feels like it has alot more leverage than the Forster, and the priming system is simpler.

 

[sask378]

I replaced everything with a Forster.

 

[Tom Morrison]

I use an ultra mag, the coax has a solid reputation, personally I would sty with the straight linkage as they have greater rigidity.

 

[Eagleye]

I have been using the Co-Ax for nigh onto 40 years, and have 2 on my loading bench right now.

I do not prime on it, so that is a non-issue. It has more than enough leverage for everything but
rounds based on the 50 BMG.

There are many good presses out there, but it is hard to beat the Co-Ax.

I have never experienced any difficulty with access, so the new shaped links do not tempt me. Dave.

 

[pete dobinson]

I use an ultra mag, the coax has a solid reputation, personally I would sty with the straight linkage as they have greater rigidity.

I agree, I'll be sticking with the straight linkage.

 

[sask378]

I use an ultra mag, the coax has a solid reputation, personally I would sty with the straight linkage as they have greater rigidity.

Greater rigidity? In this application? How so?

The hook design may actually have more rigidity in the one axis.

To me it’s an upgrade. Opens up the work area.

 

[Tom Morrison]

Greater rigidity? In this application? How so?

The hook design may actually have more rigidity in the one axis.

To me it’s an upgrade. Opens up the work area.

Yes it opens the work space but introduces a less efficient transfer of force. Maybe it’s not a problem, but it’s definitely a trade off.

 

[sask378]

Yes it opens the work space but introduces a less efficient transfer of force. Maybe it’s not a problem, but it’s definitely a trade off.

Less efficient transfer of force due to material required or applied force? This is a reloading press, not a triplex pump, engine, or a steam locomotive. The applied force difference required I'm guessing is not even measurable?

It's a great upgrade if one wants to spend the cash or take the time to make new linkages. To me that would be the trade off.

 

[Tom Morrison]

Less efficient transfer of force due to material required or applied force? This is a reloading press, not a triplex pump, engine, or a steam locomotive. The applied force difference required I'm guessing is not even measurable?

It's a great upgrade if one wants to spend the cash or take the time to make new linkages. To me that would be the trade off.

If both sides flex to to the same degree, then it’s not an issue. If they don’t, then it is. If your rounds fly straight then no problem. But I personally would not spend money on the c linkage.

 

[sask378]

If both sides flex to to the same degree, then it’s not an issue. If they don’t, then it is. If your rounds fly straight then no problem. But I personally would not spend money on the c linkage.

Wouldn't flex enough to notice. Plain and simple. Not in this application.

 

[Tom Morrison]

Wouldn't flex enough to notice. Plain and simple. Not in this application.

$100 USD in my pocket is nothing to toss out.

 

[remington jim]

I have been using the Co-Ax for nigh onto 40 years, and have 2 on my loading bench right now.

I do not prime on it, so that is a non-issue. It has more than enough leverage for everything but
rounds based on the 50 BMG.

There are many good presses out there, but it is hard to beat the Co-Ax.

I have never experienced any difficulty with access, so the new shaped links do not tempt me. Dave.

30 + Years out of mine - Not NEEDED for me either ! But Thanks for showing us them ! RJ

 

[sask378]

30 + Years out of mine - No NEEDED for me either ! RJ

Ah whatever. It's a neat idea. Yes a bit pricey. Take it easy.

 

[BenchrestJohn]

It makes a $600 press out of $500 press. I have one for last 20 years its great, got Lee non breech lock classic for resizing 338 Lapua.

 

[silverfoxdj]

I am happy with mine as is