Do you like shooting sticks or bipod, or neither

I use a 12-26" Harris bipod and usually end up on the highest setting kneeling with one knee on the ground, sitting on the heel of the leg with the knee down.
I rest my elbow stabilizing my rifle on the other knee that has my foot flat on the ground. Besides my bipod I try to think of myself as a tripod built of bone. I hope that makes sense....
 
I've been thinking about this bipod thing. I own 2 of them and for the life of me, I can't think of one big game hunting situation that they would have given me any more advantage than not having them. The only time I have ever used them is off the shooting bench. There is always a make shift rest, be it a stump, rock, tree, backpack, spotting scope or even the old reliable elbows and knees.
 
Just reviving this thread to see if anyone here could extend their comments a bit further recommend the kinds of slings they find most effective for a shooting aid? Any further input would be greatly appreciated!
 
For hunting, I use shock corded collapsible shooting sticks... light, compact, quick to set-up and to move or shift positions...
 
Just reviving this thread to see if anyone here could extend their comments a bit further recommend the kinds of slings they find most effective for a shooting aid? Any further input would be greatly appreciated!

I think it depends on the game you pursue.... sticks and pods have their place but for my hunting needs a rifle with a good sling (any sling) helps... hell, for "sudden shift" set ups I dont even like checkering.... I like to be able to move fast, get that one hand wrap on a sling and fire...

I could see pods and sticks for big game or long range..... but to be honest I just dont have those 300 yard shots that need that super steady rest. ..
 
I've used just about everything at one time or other. Bipods, both high and low, sitting sticks, standing sticks (both 2 and 3 leg) military sling, Ching sling, conventional position shooting, backpack and whatever improvised rests I could find. Nothing is going to replace having a solid knowledge of basic position shooting.

All have their place, and can be an aid in some situations. All the aids have been used as a crutch at times for people who don't know how to shoot. A bipod is a great thing in the right circumstances in the prairies, specialized long range rifles, and varmint rigs. A few of my rifles never have the bipod taken off, many will never get one put on. A lot of shooters that can do some good work from bipods are completely useless without one, but then there are also people who can't shoot except from a bench. The bipod is
very hindering on a moving target, at least when its close. There's likely nothing better for prone coyote calling in the snow, but that's sort of an acquired taste in itself. For the very longest ranges, well like I said there are some rifles that never get the bipods removed. They do tend to ruin the carrying and handling properties of a rifle. I seldom use one on a general purpose rifle anymore.

High African style shooting sticks were originally called grass sticks and were developed for the specialized use of longer range offhand shooting in chest high grass. They might even be the best for that, but have somehow taken over to the point where they will get set up even when using them is dumb. A few examples I've seen of that are setting up sticks beside a perfectly good tree, or on bare ground that prone would have been practical, or on a shot so close that a bayonet would have made more sense than a rest. Africans tend to get a little twisted up in their own traditions, and have certainly become accustomed to clients that can't shoot. If someone else wants to carry them then I don't mind but seldom use them anymore. Usually there's a tree around, often the same tree you where using for stalking cover.

Sitting sticks are OK, if you happen to be sitting. 'Course if you're sitting a sitting position works pretty good too. At least they are easier to throw away than a bipod.

I haven't found any shooting aid that will replace just learning how to shoot in the first place for sheer versatility. Since most rifles seem have a sling anyway, having and learning to use a proper shooting sling is worthwhile and doesn't clutter the rifle anymore than it already was. I used a Ching sling extensively for a few years but seem to have drifted away from it again and find myself with a bare rifle more often than not.

I haven't seen anyone who was a good offhand shot who couldn't take advantage of natural and improvised rests in different positions without thinking about it much. I have seen many that were useless when they couldn't use their Lago toy rests.

A case of .22 shells would get most shooters farther than all the crutches in the world.
 
I've used just about everything at one time or other. Bipods, both high and low, sitting sticks, standing sticks (both 2 and 3 leg) military sling, Ching sling, conventional position shooting, backpack and whatever improvised rests I could find. Nothing is going to replace having a solid knowledge of basic position shooting.

All have their place, and can be an aid in some situations. All the aids have been used as a crutch at times for people who don't know how to shoot. A bipod is a great thing in the right circumstances in the prairies, specialized long range rifles, and varmint rigs. A few of my rifles never have the bipod taken off, many will never get one put on. A lot of shooters that can do some good work from bipods are completely useless without one, but then there are also people who can't shoot except from a bench. The bipod is
very hindering on a moving target, at least when its close. There's likely nothing better for prone coyote calling in the snow, but that's sort of an acquired taste in itself. For the very longest ranges, well like I said there are some rifles that never get the bipods removed. They do tend to ruin the carrying and handling properties of a rifle. I seldom use one on a general purpose rifle anymore.

High African style shooting sticks were originally called grass sticks and were developed for the specialized use of longer range offhand shooting in chest high grass. They might even be the best for that, but have somehow taken over to the point where they will get set up even when using them is dumb. A few examples I've seen of that are setting up sticks beside a perfectly good tree, or on bare ground that prone would have been practical, or on a shot so close that a bayonet would have made more sense than a rest. Africans tend to get a little twisted up in their own traditions, and have certainly become accustomed to clients that can't shoot. If someone else wants to carry them then I don't mind but seldom use them anymore. Usually there's a tree around, often the same tree you where using for stalking cover.

Sitting sticks are OK, if you happen to be sitting. 'Course if you're sitting a sitting position works pretty good too. At least they are easier to throw away than a bipod.

I haven't found any shooting aid that will replace just learning how to shoot in the first place for sheer versatility. Since most rifles seem have a sling anyway, having and learning to use a proper shooting sling is worthwhile and doesn't clutter the rifle anymore than it already was. I used a Ching sling extensively for a few years but seem to have drifted away from it again and find myself with a bare rifle more often than not.

I haven't seen anyone who was a good offhand shot who couldn't take advantage of natural and improvised rests in different positions without thinking about it much. I have seen many that were useless when they couldn't use their Lago toy rests.

A case of .22 shells would get most shooters farther than all the crutches in the world.

Well said, with the last part bolded being the best.
 
I don't like using pods or stick for hunting. I personally find that when used, a shooter seems to get dependent on them. Using a tree or what ever is available (when required) works best. Free hand shooting increases versatility in most hunting applications.
 
Thanks to all for the responses, I appreciate it. I have always planned to make practice with the fundamentals of field positions the core of my pursuit of decent shooting in hunting situations.

Of course, I am not at the level I wish I were and will continue to practice at the range. I have decided to continue to consider the situational use of bipods/tripods/shooting sticks, but am thinking of focusing on a sling and proper field positions.

I have looked into the ching sling and also military surplus slings. This is will primary be for additional support in various field positions. Thanks again everyone.
 
I find bipods heavy, loud and awkward. I use my Bog bod shooting stix. They aren't tall enough for standing shots, But I rarely take them anyways, Always down to one knee or best case is sitting down back against and tree and gun on the stix. I'm pretty fast at it now.
 
After I missed a bear on logging rd last year, I bought primo shooting stick, a bipod. But when I practiced it at our range, I found it is difficult to stabilize itself, needless to say it does not help with shooting either. So I started online research for Harris bipod, atlas bipod. In my area, atlas bipod is useless as we need long legs. But customer reviews show that Harris bipod is not stable either.

I want to try wolf hunting this season with my savage 243. I watch the wild tv host Les Johnson of "predator quest" use Harris 13-27 inches Harris bipod, so I wonder if I should have one.

Anyone has real life experience with Harris bipod willing to share?

The Harris is the least expensive bipod that is stable, solid, and works well...so why spend more? Nothing that's cheaper, (Caldwell, etc), works well. I have the 13-27" Harris and it allows me to make long shots from a sitting position...I'd recommend it but nothing longer. Always go with the least amount of extension you can for a particular situation, and get the "S" model that swivels to shoot flat on a bit of slope. Take the Harris off if you're going for a long long hike...the extra weight does get noticeable after awhile. Hope this helps.
 
I used harris bipods on a couple of rifles, got rid of them. I use standing or kneeling/sitting length 2 leg sticks a lot in open country without natural rests. I have used tripods in Africa, they are not convenient to carry yourself. I do not normally carry a rest when hunting in thick bush, where I find a tree or kneel with the offhand as a last choice. A monopod or plain stick has worked well for me on a few occasions on running game. Keeps the elevation controlled and allows the swing.
 
I made a pair out of a 3/8ths bolt, washer , lock washer and nut combined with some 1/2 inch square wood stock bought at the hardware store. glued some leather strips on the V of the 1/2 inch wood stock to keep my fore stocks from getting scratched. Stuck some nails in the bottom of each leg to hold the sticks in place and added a spoon to hook in my belt to carry. Works like a charm. They are light, easy to carry and make for a dead accurate sitting shot.
Killed my first bear at 270 yards with em. Best of all the total cost for all materials was around 10 bucks. Making a set of sitting shooting sticks is not rocket science. I only use em if my shot is going to be over 100 yards. At 100 yards or less I shoot offhand, kneeling, or sitting.
 
I'm not certain how anyone can have a hard and fast rule about this unless you only hunt one terrain type. I've hunted areas where a bipod was the perfect and only rest available. I've hunted areas where shooting sticks were the perfect and only rest available. And I've hunted areas where there is lots of natural features to use as a rest. I choose my rest or lack thereof according to the terrain, shooting distance, species, etc. I'm not sure there is a best option for every hunting type. I own a few of each and use them accordingly. If longer ranges are in the cards, however, the bipod is pretty well a must.
 
Back
Top Bottom