If the bullet I'm loading has a cannelure, I'll crimp it, as I believe it makes my ammo just a bit better. Its not so much a case of what is gained by any one step, as what is gained by the attention that is paid to every aspect of the process. At the worst there's no downside, if done properly, except for the moment of time it takes to do it. On the other hand, it produces a more uniform bullet pull weight, not unlike seating a match bullet into the lands. It does away with the effort spent endlessly attempting to find the sweet spot for jump to the lands. With powerful rounds that generate lots of recoil, it prevents the bullet from being driven down into the case neck from a number of rounds being fired over it. Anyone who has fired a powerful revolver knows that an uncrimped bullet will pull forward and tie up the gun as it exits the chamber throat. In a magazine rifle chambered for a powerful cartridge the effect is opposite as the nose of the bullet repeatedly impacts the front magazine wall, with the mass of the cartridge behind it. I discovered that in the case of the little .458, if the case mouth is not crimped, it catches the rim and belt of the case being ejected; although I consider this more a condemnation of straight wall rifle cartridges intended for use in bolt guns than of uncrimped bullets. If you have a tendency to push a fresh round over the remaining rounds in the magazine after firing, the cumulative effect on the second round in the magazine will result in a jam when you attempt to chamber it. As a rule I try to choose game bullets with cannelures, or better yet crimping grooves, but every now and then I get one without, like the Woodleigh .308/240, I just seat it so it will cycle through the magazine without catching, but I wish it had a cannelure.