Yes. The biggest loser, unfortunately is the consumer. I like Zeiss. When I hear the name, I think German Precision, microfine tolerances, innovation, and things that work 'just so' with tactile precision, etc etc.
When we lose a player like this we all lose one of the things that drives markets to be better, we lose the competition that pushes us to become better.
My last Conquest was a higher mag scope, and the glass was lacking
Compared to a Sightron S3 of same $$$ it was to be blunt, an embarrassment. Even sent back to Zeiss, it came back with 'zere is nozing wrong vis dis skope!'
I believe that when a company starts ignoring issues like this, the problem begins. When they rest on their laurels and say 'we have reached the pinnacle' , it is time to fire the guys at the top, and perhaps hire others who will see the need for changes, like listening to what an enthusiast wants.
It is scary that a well-respected, well run company can head this way, but I suppose Zeiss took a look at the books and said 'we make more money elsewhere now, so we can afford to let our founding lines die'
It sucks.