dying to get the M37... ETA?

mildcustom2 said:
There's always more than we know behind the scenes. The time for complaining about it is over. Now we just need to help find a solution if we can. If I had the drawings for the parts needed I could get my CNC shop to quote on it and I could assemble the receivers.
Click to expand...

isnt there a FRT number for a home built version of the TNW1919? not that that would help in this case.
 
223762 said:
isnt there a FRT number for a home built version of the TNW1919? not that that would help in this case.
Click to expand...

Actually several home builts to my knowledge. Even if I made one I'd still have to send it in for examination. It's like S&W making a 1911 and Colt makes the same gun but both still have to go in for examination even if they are the exact same firearm.
 
mildcustom2 said:
Actually several home builts to my knowledge. Even if I made one I'd still have to send it in for examination. It's like S&W making a 1911 and Colt makes the same gun but both still have to go in for examination even if they are the exact same firearm.
Click to expand...

that still applies to non-restricted? im sure its come up but i couldnt remember.
 
223762 said:
that still applies to non-restricted? im sure its come up but i couldnt remember.
Click to expand...

It's actually debatable if there would be a legal requirement to send in a firearm built to non restricted status as defined by Canadian law if that firearm is built in Canada. It's not like it's going to be imported or exported.
 
223762 said:
it sure would. at least knowing where their at in this proses would be nice.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure the answer will not change for a while yet. Alberta Tactical was going through the same headaches as will effect these guns. The RCMP's new rule of all five sides of the receiver being new will put a halt to any new guns showing up. And now, if for some reason your existing TNW goes to the lab for determination, they will declare it a converted auto despite the non-restricted calssification in the FRT. After all, they are just applying the law.

I have heard rumour that something is supposed to happen with regard to the classification of these guns soon, but whether it will be favorable or not will be the $10,000 question.
 
stencollector said:
Pretty sure the answer will not change for a while yet. Alberta Tactical was going through the same headaches as will effect these guns. The RCMP's new rule of all five sides of the receiver being new will put a halt to any new guns showing up. And now, if for some reason your existing TNW goes to the lab for determination, they will declare it a converted auto despite the non-restricted calssification in the FRT. After all, they are just applying the law.

I have heard rumour that something is supposed to happen with regard to the classification of these guns soon, but whether it will be favorable or not will be the $10,000 question.
Click to expand...

i like rumours. they are better then silence...
 
There is no update - it's with the RCMP/CFC lab. Nothing NS can do at this point. These likely won't see the light of day as the RCMP have changed their interpretation of what makes it 'new manufacture' and not a C/A.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom