E-Lander AIA M10 on M14 platform

Chatrbaz84

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
35   0   0
Location
Canada
Hi everyone ,
Have you guys every try E-Lander AIA M10 on M14 platform rifle?
Fits?
Jam?
Problems?

Any result and review?


Is there any mark on the mags regarding " E-Lander AIA M10 " ? once the mag capacity is restricted can we use on M14 platform legally safe and sound ?!

if the thread is hurting send me a PM pls
 
They do not have the cut out, instead friction fit. Using them, in public, it might be an idea to keep a copy of RCMP bulletin #72 with you.

And don't forget to mention, in case the OP isn't aware, that it's a big no no to put the hole in the mag. As stupid as that is, that is the way it is.
 
Hi everyone ,
Have you guys every try E-Lander AIA M10 on M14 platform rifle?
Fits?
Jam?
Problems?

Any result and review?


Is there any mark on the mags regarding " E-Lander AIA M10 " ? once the mag capacity is restricted can we use on M14 platform legally safe and sound ?!

if the thread is hurting send me a PM pls

It does not matter what the magazine was used in, only what it was designed for. Those magazines are designed for a bolt-action rifle, so 10 rounds is 100% legal.
 
Sadly, if the importer had any balls he would have challenged the "dual-use" nonsense and we could now be rocking 20/30/whatever round mags. That also would have prevented the whole 10/22 mag fiasco. Alas, the safe route was taken and here we are.
 
Never had any feeding issues and the rifle functions as it should... bolt hold open, charging handle sling shots, etc. When I threw on an Archangel stock, the magazine fits even better.
 
Sadly, if the importer had any balls he would have challenged the "dual-use" nonsense and we could now be rocking 20/30/whatever round mags. That also would have prevented the whole 10/22 mag fiasco. Alas, the safe route was taken and here we are.

I think there is a little blurb about Enfield mags being limited to 10 because of some NZ auto conversion rifle back in WW2 that took extended mags..... I think.
 
The regulations specifically call out the lee-enfield magazine to only have 10 rounds max.

(ii) is a rifle of the type commonly known as the “Lee Enfield” rifle, where the magazine is capable of containing not more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed, or

The AIA rifle could easily be a "type" of Lee-enfield rifle.

Also if there is any interest; Bill C-80 Special committee meeting recommendations (1990?) on ammunition size limits. It calls out the Lee-enfield magazine to be exempted from the initially proposed 5 shot maximum.

The Department of Justice has suggested that magazines designed for certain non-semi-automatic firearms, but which fit some modern semi-automatics, such as the 10-shot Lee-enfield, would be exempted.

ExpuBjX.jpg

F3jnAli.jpg

MQ90hjX.jpg
 
Hi everyone ,
Have you guys every try E-Lander AIA M10 on M14 platform rifle?
Fits?
Jam?
Problems?

Any result and review?


Is there any mark on the mags regarding " E-Lander AIA M10 " ? once the mag capacity is restricted can we use on M14 platform legally safe and sound ?!

if the thread is hurting send me a PM pls

I have had plenty of issues with mine. For one, they do not like being fed with stripper clips. Second, at least 50% of the time the follower binds nose-up on the last few shots causing a stoppage. This is in two different m305's which cause none of the above issues with norc 5/20 mags. I imagine some filing of the followers may help, but for the price of these mags, they have been a disappointment for me.

They do, however, insert easily and seat snugly in all the synthetic stocked m305's I've seen them seated into
 
Mine work ok. They're a little shorter in cartridge length than the stock m305 mag which is a bummer if you are reloading for it. For factory ammo your good to go.
 
No one is sure why the magazine exemption lists the Lee Enfield magazine. The section describing the L-E mag is one that exempts magazines from restriction:

(2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not include any cartridge magazine that [This means that the following items are exempt, but would otherwise be covered by (1)(a), the LE would not be covered by (1)(a)]

(a) was originally designed or manufactured for use in a firearm that

(i) is chambered for, or designed to use, rimfire cartridges,

(ii) is a rifle of the type commonly known as the “Lee Enfield” rifle, where the magazine is capable of containing not more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed, or

(iii) is commonly known as the U.S. Rifle M1 (Garand) including the Beretta M1 Garand rifle, the Breda M1 Garand rifle and the Springfield Armoury M1 Garand rifle;


Basically the Act is so poorly written that it looks like they believed the L-E was a semi (see the reference to the Garand above) and exempted it from restriction, not knowing themselves that it was already exempt as a bolt gun. There's a ton of those types of error throughout the Act, but what do you expect when a bunch of primarily French speaking lawyers write a law covering items they don't understand or have any knowledge of, and then another lawyer with no knowledge translates that into English.

For those curious, here is the (1)(a) that the section above is referring to:

(1) Any cartridge magazine

(a) that is capable of containing more than five cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in

(i) a semi-automatic handgun that is not commonly available in Canada,

(ii) a semi-automatic firearm other than a semi-automatic handgun,

(iii) an automatic firearm whether or not it has been altered to discharge only one projectile with one pressure of the trigger,

(iv) the firearms of the designs commonly known as the Ingram M10 and M11 pistols, and any variants or modified versions of them, including the Cobray M10 and M11 pistols, the RPB M10, M11 and SM11 pistols and the SWD M10, M11, SM10 and SM11 pistols,

(v) the firearm of the design commonly known as the Partisan Avenger Auto Pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, or

(vi) the firearm of the design commonly known as the UZI pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, including the Micro-UZI pistol; or


I don't see anything that describes an L-E there, do you?

Here's the footnote for all of that:

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-98-462/FullText.html
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom