EAL .303 Rifle value?

Terryn: Note on the EAL Buckhorn thread, there is a CA (Canadian Arsenals) proof under the buckhorn sight, half way or so between the big CA on the barrel flat and the sight dovetail in the barrel.

Could you please see if your rifle has that second CA on it too?

On mine, I just had to lift the rear sight and then pull the ladder out. The sight would just slide out of the dovetail easily then.

I note that yours has patina where the original sight ears were. Nothing done recently. You can also see how the hole for the spring plunger has been filled.

My estimate for the value of yours...about $400?
 
I can only see one on the barrel flat underneath the sight ladder. this rifle also has the machined trigger guard and i heard some are stamped.
 
I was wrong, the trigger guard is stamped . Thanks for all the info guys. Figured there would be lots in here with info on an enfield variant.
 
I have this one with the Marbles buckhorn mounted but a bit further back, only has the small CA with the barrel flat being blank, holes drilled for a Lyman perhaps, and rear sights milled off with the hole still present.

IMG_6781_zps5a3b1d5c.jpg
 
I have this one with the Marbles buckhorn mounted but a bit further back, only has the small CA with the barrel flat being blank, holes drilled for a Lyman perhaps, and rear sights milled off with the hole still present.

IMG_6781_zps5a3b1d5c.jpg

Is this one marked EAL with a serial # on left side of the receiver?
 
There is never a never when it comes to EAL rifles. I saw one that came in to a store that was new in a plain cardboard box. It was wrapped in brown wax paper. The bolt and mag were separate and each were wrapped in the same brown wax paper.

The stock on this particular rifle was made from exceptionally figured wood and the left side of the receiver was drilled and tapped for a Weaver side mount base. The fore end was also carved in a beaver tail style. The mounted sights were the same as those found on the military versions.

The rifle also came with a bill which listed all of the mods and the fee for those mods. Ridiculously cheap by todays standards.

EAL would and did build rifles to customer specs. Some of the customers were individuals but for the most part, they were bigger commercial outlets, like Army and Navy, SIR, Lever ARMs etc. I'm not saying they brought in thousands because they didn't. I was at Lever Arms one summer and helped unpack just over a hundred of them. That's where I saw the custom stocked example. They were different though. Most were standard but there were sight variations on some. Never saw a Marbles or any other such sight on any of them. I don't remember seeing any of them with machined trigger guards and would be skeptical about their originality.

Considering all of the different offerings out there at the time and companies like Globe, Parker Hale etc, the EAL rifles were not cheap. The thing is, they were well done and Canadian.

In many ways, it's to bad they didn't catch on. Mind you, some of the aftermarket offerings were more modern looking and appealed to more customers at the time. I suspect Essential Agencies went the way of the Dodo bird from lack of sales.

I need to edit this because EAL is still a viable company. They deal in sporting goods and accessories and are located in Toronto.

The last information I have is they have two employees and do less than $400,000 in business per year.

I sent them an email asking whether or not they are the same company and if they have any old records buried away. Never got a reply. Maybe someone in their area could drop in and pique their interest????

I am also under the impression that EAL farmed out all of the work done on both the military version and the civilian version. I know it was possible to place an order with them for variations on the model chosen. I have seen them with double digit serial numbers as well and I have seen them with serial numbers in the high nine thousand ranges. I think the rumor out there about the numbers made are contradictory at best. Then again, maybe they started a new serial number range depending on options???? These are a real mystery and almost impossible to pin down definitive descriptions on. Considering the time the rifles were built in, I am surprised they made as many as they did.

One rumor I don't believe is that they only made up a thousand for the military. Allen Lever once commented to me in a very POed manner that he felt they made 3 to 5 times that many for the Canadian Forces. He wasn't happy with the way the bidding was done to make up the rifles either. That was over 45 years ago. Just can't remember all of the details clearly. I do remember that beautiful EAL custom stocked rifle like it was yesterday though. Whoever EAL hired out the work to were craftsmen indeed. In some ways, I miss those days but whether or not I could get by as well without all of the luxuries I enjoy now is a toss up. Mind you there was a lot less to take care of and life wasn't nearly so cluttered. That is likely more reminiscing than reality though. We were much less informed and much more emotional about everything. The common response for men was the John Wayne approach. For women, it just depended on how much they were beaten. I kid you not. They may not have been beaten physically but jobs were determined by ### and legal lines were drawn and allowed such discrimination. What a deplorable waste of good minds and abilities.
 
Last edited:
well you guys seem to know way more about these rifles than me, glad i started this post. at first glance i was thinking it was a parker hale. the rifle was passed down after an uncle passed away years ago. I never fired it but my father borrowed it one hunting season about 45 years ago and shot a deer with it. probably hasn't had a shot fired out of it in 20 years or more.
 
Here are some pics of the rear receiver of a military EAL rifle.

The rear of the receiver with no sight mounts should look something like this if done by EAL.

If not, it was likely done by someone else

IMG_2299_zps1f7a8c7e.jpg


c432c045-58ea-40c6-9f7b-2d5ddbf0bcd6_zpse6070380.jpg


IMG_2302_zpsf4b4d6dd.jpg


IMG_2280_zps1b1bdd5d.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ax, what is the serial number range of your rifle? I have one like the OP's posted one, receiver sight ears machined off the same. Prbably much earlier than yours.

Here are some pics of the rear receiver of a military EAL rifle.

The rear of the receiver with no sight mounts should look something like this if done by EAL.

If not, it was likely done by someone else

IMG_2299_zps1f7a8c7e.jpg


c432c045-58ea-40c6-9f7b-2d5ddbf0bcd6_zpse6070380.jpg


IMG_2302_zpsf4b4d6dd.jpg


IMG_2280_zps1b1bdd5d.jpg
 
Ax- Your military type rifle is no doubt a high s/n rifle, between 4800-6900 or so.

Well advanced in production.

Who's to say what EAL and their machine shop S. T. Francis and Sons were doing in early production? No doubt things changed over the course of production over a few years.
 
Back
Top Bottom