R.G. said:
Riflechair said:
Riflechair said:One of the things that attracted me to this rifle was the sling. Yes it is stock and includes the original sling rivets. This rifle is so friggin sweet I can hardly contain myself. Plus being a Ranger I have a certain sense of heritage. This was originally advertized as a civilian model but the sling tells me otherwise. Either way I am very happy Cantom![]()
Riflechair said:No not a normal enfield sling. The sling is slightly wider and the clasp is very heavy duty. You know, the old metal tension clasp.
![]()
![]()
longbranch* said:I've never seen evidence that EAL's were sold with a sling, not saying they didnt but without proof like a brochure or something have to assume they didnt. I would suggest a Canadian marked web sling would be most appropriate for an EAL IMHO.
woodchopper said:mine looks almost the same as Riflechair's,
No sling and slightly different, earlier markings, but in the civi pattern
bearhunter said:Cantom, both of the slings pictured are different from each other and riflechairs'. I have an EAL in unissued excellent condition that is identical to Wrong Ways' and Bwingoilots'.
It came to me from a fellow, now passed on and dearly missed, Walt Rogers. Walt was a weapons tech for 25 years and though I'm not sure where the rifle came from, he said it was from stores, enough said.
The main reason for the reply is to say that the rifle has an issue web sling as found on a No4 rifle and sling swivels to fit, that is in the same condition as the rifle, excellent. Now this by no means is conclusive evidence as to the type of sling that was issued to the rifles and I am of the opinion that in many cses it was left up to the individual it was issued to, but i am also under the opinion that the government wouldn't issue anything other than slings that were already in stores. I've also seen EAL rifles with WW1 issue P14 slings. bearhunter



























