Wow... quite a smell of urine on this posting, from all the pissing contests going on.
How about we all concur that we get what we pay for? My first scope purchase has been a Bushnell 3200 Elite 10x40, at $200. Seemingly good scope, very clear, mil-dots, and short eye relief. Now I am no expert, but can you really compare this scope to scopes that are three times as much? My favourite scopes when I was looking were the Kahles scopes. Unbelievably better than my Bushnell in every way. But it better be, as it cost around $2000, or TEN times the Bushnell. Is a Ferrari better than my Mazda? Of course, and they do the exact same thing for 80% of the time. Just the Ferrari is better for the other 20%. Same for the scopes, I'm sure I will get a lot of good use from the 3200 Elite, but if I could spare the money, I would have bought the Kahles hands down...