Oh someone bought the hype. Good luck substantiating that claim.
lol...I thought it and you wrote it. By the way, does anyone use 200gr bullets in the .338 WM?
Oh someone bought the hype. Good luck substantiating that claim.
lol...I thought it and you wrote it. By the way, does anyone use 200gr bullets in the .338 WM?
lol...I thought it and you wrote it. By the way, does anyone use 200gr bullets in the .338 WM?

I wanna go elk hunting and I can't make up my mind what to get ,I want to stay with common rounds. So no wildcat stuff as I'm on $1500-$2000 budget. Let me know what you think
I wanna go elk hunting and I can't make up my mind what to get ,I want to stay with common rounds. So no wildcat stuff as I'm on $1500-$2000 budget. Let me know what you think
The .323 200 grain has a higher BC than the .338 equivalent..., but I guess you guys don't pay any attention to things like that, to each his own.... And who seems to think you need more than a 200 grain for elk? I have dropped every elk I have ever shot with a 140, some at extreme distances, all one shot, clean kills.
Now the .338 300 grain, that is a whole different story, insane BC, but I thought we were talking about Elk, not Cape Buffalo at 2 miles...... and a rifle with glass combo under $2,000.00.
No need to attack the new guy.... It's okay that I have an opinion, based upon available data and persoanl experience. Of those that slammed my post, how many of you own and have fired BOTH calibers? I do, and I have. My apologies for insulting the armchair uberhunter/supersniper/coffeeshopwannabe's.
The .323 200 grain has a higher BC than the .338 equivalent..., but I guess you guys don't pay any attention to things like that, to each his own.... And who seems to think you need more than a 200 grain for elk? I have dropped every elk I have ever shot with a 140, some at extreme distances, all one shot, clean kills.
Now the .338 300 grain, that is a whole different story, insane BC, but I thought we were talking about Elk, not Cape Buffalo at 2 miles...... and a rifle with glass combo under $2,000.00.
No need to attack the new guy.... It's okay that I have an opinion, based upon available data and persoanl experience. Of those that slammed my post, how many of you own and have fired BOTH calibers? I do, and I have. My apologies for insulting the armchair uberhunter/supersniper/coffeeshopwannabe's.

I buy a Weatherby Vanguard 2 in 300 mag/ 300 wsm and a Zeiss Conquest 3.5-10x44. Way more value in the Conquest line then the overpriced Leupold VX stuff.
"Yes" to the .35Whelen. I took a nice 6X6 elk September 2011 with 225 TSX handload at 186 yards. Bull went down within 10 yards. Less recoil than .338 also.Don't count out the 35 Whelen with 225gr Partitions @ 2700fps or a 250 @ 2550fps. Both loads will drop em. I also use my Tikka T3 30/06 and 180 Partitions and a 300 WBY and 200gr Partitions @ 3000fps. In the thick stuff I use my BLR 358 Win and 225gr Partitions @ 2470fps. All good rounds. All with Leupold glass. 1500 to 2000 for any of these guns and glass. A Ruger SS in 35 Whelen near ideal less recoil than a 338.
This is true if you are talking about the VX-2 and VX-3, but the VX-6 is on a different level. If he has a $2000 budget he should buy the best glass possible within his limits. IMO, while the Conquest is very good bang for the $, it certainly is not the best within his price range.
But you are right on the Vanguard 2 - they look fantastic and can be had for $500.
Rifle - $500
S&B Klassic - $1450
Mounts and tax will bring you over the $2000, but not by much. With a VX-6 you will come in quite a bit under budget.



























