yes. you didn't answer my question.Would yours?
yes. you didn't answer my question.
Cry with their hand held out to the gov`t like always. Look what happened with the housing up north ONT. I figure: They want their land, fence the land and they can stay within their boundaries. If they deplete everything there...Oh Well.So what are they going to do (natives) when they've hunted everything into extinction in canada?. Seems highly overkill to be sustenance hunting...
WOOSH.
The sound of a joke flying right over your head.![]()
I did, you just didn't catch on, AGAIN....If the were legally tagged with a tag obtained through a draw system, as the Algonquins have here it would be just fine....
At least these hunts were sanctioned and controlled....just think about how many poachers shoot elk for only the antlers to sell , I bet these number many more than these hunts. These elk were going as food, not left in the bush to rot. Sometimes also the herds have to be culled, so the area can support the numbers.
So, if these people met your definition of legal, it would be alright. But, they only me the provincial definition of legal, so not good.
So, if these people met your definition of legal, it would be alright. But, they only me the provincial definition of legal, so not good.
A tag system for aboriginal hunters would sort this out...
I responded to this because I don't see how or what would be sorted out. I asked if they were tagged it would be ok? You responded that it would be more legal? A tag system for aboriginals would do what? They all have the right to hunt.
So, give all the aboriginal's tags and they go out and shoot, no different.
You are directing your anger at the natives, maybe it should be directed at the govt. Or, atleast the gov't from 125 years ago.
I don't agree with Flett's reasoning for the kill. (idle no more) But if, and thats a big if, its their annual hunt for sustinance.......



























