Emergency Act and The Senate

Brutus said:
Look two steps ahead friend. With the very recent passing the Emergency Act, what is the highly predictable outcome regarding a non confidence vote?

Think.
Click to expand...

If she removed the PM. Freeland, a proud WEF board member would take over.
https://www.weforum.org/people/chrystia-freeland

Things would be no better. She basically runs things already anyway. Drama teacher is so often surfing in Tofino for a week at a time or fleeing parliament in a hissy fit that the Libs need another hand to take the wheel.

The only real hope is an election, and with the state of the media and the CPC, I don't know if the outcome would be favourable.

The NDP would probably come out ahead of where they are presently. I think that is why they supported the EMA.

The Conservatives need to get their house in order in a hurry.
 
I did, tonight, and it was easy to do. Initially, I'd intended to write each of them a unique letter, but then I woke up, and just wrote one letter; they each got a copy of the same letter.
 
Just a reminder, this is factually incorrect.

hunter58
“You also need to email the Governor General she can remove Trudeau if she get enough emails stating non confidence in him”

Source? The Governor General

A no confidence vote by a majority of MPs in the House of Commons can lead to the dissolution of the federal government, but no equivalent mechanism exists for ordinary citizens.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RideauHa...17427.ampproject.net/2202042210001/frame.html
 
Last edited:
Morc said:
Of interesting note is that the government is not providing justification to the senators on why they implemented the act and what intelligence they received that suddenly after weeks of inaction required the sledgehammer approach.

National Security, trust us.
Click to expand...

I've read there's an oath to secrecy going around too.
 
P11 said:
What did she say?
Click to expand...
Her analysis of the use of the EMA was, IMO, pure dismissal at best and quite brief. But most of her tirade was social justice virtue signalling. One thing about people who believe they are the "smartest in the room" is that they love to hear themselves talk and she was proof of that. She had to be warned her time was up.

It was difficult to watch and was quite disappointing. The Senate is supposed to be our "sober second thought" in our legislation process, when in reality it sure appears to be a "drunk with power rubber stamp".

Lines were clearly drawn.
 
The senate is a bloated corpse IMO. "independent" senators who are not independent at all. They should be voted in just like any other MP and should have term limits/seek re-election every 4 years. I dont remember a single time where the senate voted down a motion or law. Pure theatrics, it makes my piss boil.
 
Third Rail said:
Her analysis of the use of the EMA was, IMO, pure dismissal at best and quite brief. But most of her tirade was social justice virtue signalling. One thing about people who believe they are the "smartest in the room" is that they love to hear themselves talk and she was proof of that. She had to be warned her time was up.

It was difficult to watch and was quite disappointing. The Senate is supposed to be our "sober second thought" in our legislation process, when in reality it sure appears to be a "drunk with power rubber stamp".

Lines were clearly drawn.
Click to expand...
She's a giant jack@ss. i dealt with her when I was presenting to the Senate committtee on Bill C-72. She's also a rabid anti and a member of the Coalition for Gun Control. She's the poster child for why retroactive abortion should be legal.
 
hsatimmy said:
I've read there's an oath to secrecy going around too.
Click to expand...

If you believe this, you may also believe in the origins of the book of mormon.

This is like the firearms ban. They don't have any justification outside of a political justification. They hide behind 'cabinet confidentiality and 'public safety' to thinly obfuscate their political motive.
 
If anyone wants to use my letter to a senator please do.

Re: Emergencies Act

Dear Senator,

I fear that Canadian democracy is being repudiated. The current government is acting as a dictator to suppress dissent, using physical and financial force to eliminate protest, and using disinformation to divide Canadians. The Emergencies Act is not legally used for the recent situation of peaceful protest or endemic mild illness.

Using a sledgehammer to crack a nut results in a messy waste of resources. In this case, it will also shatter the trust Canadians have in you, our government. Already, federal voter turnout is low... what good can come of less citizen involvement in the traditional political system?

Other unwanted side effects: distrust of financial institutions due to fear of accounts being frozen; distrust of police; distrust of our fiat currency; distrust of our tax structure and a shift to underground economy.

People are a resource; free people much more so.

Please vote against the Emergencies Act.

Sincerely,
 
I phoned each one. Mostly voicemail and left message, spoke to a few, several were no answer and full voicemail.
We all need to make noise and be heard.

If we do nothing, we have no right to complain about policies we disagree with.

One thing our political opposition does - the actual fringe minority, is organize and make noise. This noise convinces the majority of people who are 'undecided'. This mass of noisy activists and undecided and then appear to be the majority. This is only because they organize and make noise.

We must learn - organize, and amplify our message. Do NOT sit idly by and watch a ship of fools destroy our nation.

If you want things to change, YOU MUST GET ACTIVE
 
Financial institutions are starting to push back on the account freezing, as it has eroded trust in the banks among normal Canadians. People have started to withdraw cash, this costs the banks unimaginable amounts of money. I would never advocate pulling your cash out of the banks, even though it seems to be getting Trudeau's bosses extremely mad at him, and making them ease back on their financial retribution toward single mothers who donated 25 dollars to the convoy.
 
apexanimal said:
Financial institutions are starting to push back on the account freezing, as it has eroded trust in the banks among normal Canadians. People have started to withdraw cash, this costs the banks unimaginable amounts of money. I would never advocate pulling your cash out of the banks, even though it seems to be getting Trudeau's bosses extremely mad at him, and making them ease back on their financial retribution toward single mothers who donated 25 dollars to the convoy.
Click to expand...

Going to the bank and making a large temporary cash withdrawal may be our most effective way to vote right now
 
The house of cards has collapsed
There is no Left right politics they all work for the WEF
The parliamentary system is corrupt
The economy will now tank due to investors now thinking twice of heading to a communist state and the banks have destroyed any and all trust that your money is safe.
 
Has anyone else heard the rumour that the rcmp is confiscating firearms of people who donated to the freedom convoy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom