My two cents... take it for what it's worth
For me, it's all about pedigree, condition and intended use.
Pedigree...
- I would ask to see the makers marks & stamps
...can't see any in posted photos
- A rare manufacturer like Howard Auto Cultivator Company (HAC) command higher prices and are more desirable to a collector
- An original Enfield is always nice to have
- Do all the serial numbers match (barrel, cylinder, frame, etc.)?
Condition...
- Mint? More photos or in-hand inspection need before I could make that call
- It appears to be refinished (not something most collectors want and not mint)
- Check out an original 1940 Enfield tanker here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enfield-No2.jpg
- Date of manufacture... pre WW2 & war time are far more desirable
- Is it a No. 2 Mk. 1 or No. 2 Mk. 1* or No. 2 Mk. 1**?
...can't tell in posted photos
- Appears to be a tanker... double action only
- Grips look like they have been replaced (repros?)
Use...
- As a collector piece... not as desirable if it's been refinished or parkerized
- As a shooter... double action is not as accurate as single action
(you need a stronger pull on the trigger which results in more movement and less accuracy)
Like I said, this is just my opinion.
I have an original (all be it deactivated) Enfield 1932 No. 2 Mk. 1 (numbers matching). The finish on mine looks nothing like the one posted in EE. The revolver posted in EE looks a little too "new" to me.
You can find more information here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enfield_revolver
All the best!