stickhunter
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Victoria, B.C.
I recently purchased a used rifle that came with this style of Leupold QR base/rings:
I took the rifle apart for a cleaning/inspection and remounted the base and locked in the rings. When I used my scope alignment bars to check the rings, I noticed that the front ring had noticeable play, both rotationally and back-to-front. The play was small, but in comparison, the rear ring was rock solid. I also noticed that the front lever took quite a bit less force to lock than the rear lever.
I swapped the front/rear rings and this increased the tension on the front lever and reduced the tension on the back lever, but the front ring still had a small bit of play. Finally, I swapped the levers/locking bars and repeated the previous test. In every case, the front ring had play, which makes me think the hole is oversize.
I phoned Leupold and they confirmed that the rings should lock up fully, so based on my findings, their recommendation was to buy a new base. Unfortunately, there is no warranty, and the base is the most expensive part of this type of QR system. With a scope locking the rings together, there is no apparent play, but I don't want the scope to be holding the rings in place.
I now have to decide whether to replace the base or switch to a different ring/base combo. I've not read anything negative about this QR system, except for levers sometimes breaking, so I'm leaning toward my base having a manufacturing defect --- I can't see any visible damage or peening.
Just curious if anyone else has had this issue with the Leupold QR base? I don't mind trying it again with a new base as long as it's not prone to wearing loose.
I took the rifle apart for a cleaning/inspection and remounted the base and locked in the rings. When I used my scope alignment bars to check the rings, I noticed that the front ring had noticeable play, both rotationally and back-to-front. The play was small, but in comparison, the rear ring was rock solid. I also noticed that the front lever took quite a bit less force to lock than the rear lever.
I swapped the front/rear rings and this increased the tension on the front lever and reduced the tension on the back lever, but the front ring still had a small bit of play. Finally, I swapped the levers/locking bars and repeated the previous test. In every case, the front ring had play, which makes me think the hole is oversize.
I phoned Leupold and they confirmed that the rings should lock up fully, so based on my findings, their recommendation was to buy a new base. Unfortunately, there is no warranty, and the base is the most expensive part of this type of QR system. With a scope locking the rings together, there is no apparent play, but I don't want the scope to be holding the rings in place.
I now have to decide whether to replace the base or switch to a different ring/base combo. I've not read anything negative about this QR system, except for levers sometimes breaking, so I'm leaning toward my base having a manufacturing defect --- I can't see any visible damage or peening.
Just curious if anyone else has had this issue with the Leupold QR base? I don't mind trying it again with a new base as long as it's not prone to wearing loose.
Last edited:




















































