Everyone seems to like the fine reticles - why? I mean, for target shooting I totally get it, but for hunting? A fine reticle can be harder to pick out, especially if you're not wearing your glasses, or if your parallax/diopter adjustment gets bumped, or if there's fog anywhere. It's just not a 'robust' system. I like duplex reticles, or post-style reticles for hunting - the center area is fine enough that it doesn't obstruct your target, but the rest of the reticle is heavy enough to stand out really well so that you're not spending a lot of time hunting for your reticle in less-than-ideal conditions.
For paper shooting, a fine reticle is great, and for general-purpose shooting, I really like mildots. Given enough time and experience shooting with dots, they become second-nature. And they're standardized, unlike some of the silly 'BDC' reticles - you can start to judge distances by the size of common objects relative to the dots - if a gopher is one dot high, then my holdover is 'x' and if it's 3 dots high then it's 'y,' sort of thing