If I have no miss from 0 to 300m on Fig11, I’m a happy camper![]()
This is my accuracy standard also. Not pinpoint accuracy but consistent and good enough
I'm sometimes amazed by the degree of accuracy people can achieve with sharp senses, good equipment, and thorough training.
I have none of these things and my performance is laughable, so I keep dialing down my engagement range year after year.
But, other than "somewhere between the two" I don't have a good grasp of where the general population lies.
A poll:
If you grabbed your favorite rifle right now, walked couple of km to the top of the proverbial grassy knoll, and then took a shot at a target 100m away, you'd feel reasonably confident of your first shot hitting within X" of the bullseye.
What's X for you?
1"?
4"?
"somewhere off to the right, I think..."?
No bench, no table. Just you, short grass, and your pack to rest the barrel on (or whatever other position you prefer).
About 3"; mostly because many of my rifles are sighted in that way.
Sighted in 3" high?
Its a very common method of sighting in for open country. Most any big game rifle worth loading is good for zero to 300 yards with a center hold and not a thought given to range up to that point. Top of the back makes it to 400. Relics from the black powder era need not apply.
These days people usually refer to it as the MPBR method (Maximum Point Blank Range), but "3 high", and the "Rule of Three" (take a rifle around 3000 fps, sight in three high and shoot to three) are also used.
I typically carry my rifles equipped with turret scopes with the first 2.5 -3 MOA pre-dialled in.