Here is what I am trying to learn more - why avoid a polymer striker fired?
Why would one choose a 226 over a 320 or vice versa or G17 vs a 19 vs 34? Are there core design concepts that are different? Reliabilty / simplicity in maintenance? Are safeties different? I am assuming none of these are like the Hi power that requires the mag in to fire off ? Some suited for larger vs smaller hands? Hi Power to bite some some soldiers due to their grip. I read 320s originally had a drop fire issue that has been rectified
I don't know what the future holds and was thinking something that I will be happy down the road should I get to a grandfathered in situation.
I do like the idea of a Hi-Power just because that is what I qualify on every year. If the army switched to the 226 or another modern pistol, that is probably what I would go with just for that consistency.
Then truthfully go to the Hi-Power, but I'm not sure about a 22 kit? Most if not all guns mentioned here are good ones. Can't speak to all the polymer striker pistols, but they take more time & practice to get competent with compared to most of the steel framed guns mentioned. I own both, & like both. But one gun, that's not going to get shot a lot, would be a revolver in my mind. Pending that, a steel or alloy hammered DA/SA pistol. Typically have much better triggers and have the ability to be shot in different actions. I'm pretty sure the Hi-Power comes in a DA/SA model or did? Again, absolutely nothing wrong with a Browning & believe a 9mm is a wise choice. The weight savings of a polymer frame really doesn't make a difference in your description of use & that savings in weight is going to make felt recoil a "LITTLE" worse. I mean it's a nine, so at the worst of times it's not bad...
Opinions on the interweb are just that! A range day with rentals is a great idea if you can find one open anytime soon. -Cheers


















































