Is there anything fundamentally different between these Classic designs and say a 617, 686 or 66?
The S&W 617 & 19 are K frames. The 686 is an L (slightly larger). And the 27 is based on the N frame (44 mag size).
Is there anything fundamentally different between these Classic designs and say a 617, 686 or 66?
Did anyone else smile when they read the thread title?
I appreciate all the responses.
Nothing against Turkish guns....have actively been looking at some of their shotgun options but I have no plans on purchasing a Chinese or Russian firearm (though I have been considering a Finnish or Polish Moisins).
During my time off I have been looking more at revolvers as well so as some of you are suggesting just one may be impossible and maybe one of each is a more realistic goal.
Wolverine is my favourite dealer so I always try support them when I can but I don't live as close to them as I used to so going to them wont be an option. I have enjoyed Wanstalls as well and it seems like they actually have better selection right now. Although some items look to be out of stock. Of course will be watching exchange as well. All my browsing is currently from my phone so will definitely have to look at some of the site sponsors when I get home and have access to my computer and more time to browse. Once life begins to return to normal and social distancing isnt going to impede things I will see what I can physically handle in my local stores.
G34
P320 M17
FNX-9
Browning 1911
Definitely higher than the pistol budget so this would definitely be a stretch goal.
S&W Classic 19
S&W Classic 27
Is there anything fundamentally different between these Classic designs and say a 617, 686 or 66?
I am interested in getting a pistol soon solely to be potentially grandfathered in depending on what happens - I don't get to the range much and so this probably wont see a ton of use in the short term so ideally keeping it >= $1000 would be great. I have only ever use a Browning Hi Power but only once a year so I am familiar with 9mm and would likely stick with that caliber. What would be so recommended reading to decide between a Glock, SIG or FN. My first thought was the P320 that Wolverine has (although I am not opposed to going used). I don't know the pros / cons, and design differences between a lot of these pistols but do like the idea of a military pistol...
Here is what I am trying to learn more - why avoid a polymer striker fired?
Why would one choose a 226 over a 320 or vice versa or G17 vs a 19 vs 34? Are there core design concepts that are different? Reliabilty / simplicity in maintenance? Are safeties different? I am assuming none of these are like the Hi power that requires the mag in to fire off ? Some suited for larger vs smaller hands? Hi Power to bite some some soldiers due to their grip. I read 320s originally had a drop fire issue that has been rectified
I don't know what the future holds and was thinking something that I will be happy down the road should I get to a grandfathered in situation.
I do like the idea of a Hi-Power just because that is what I qualify on every year. If the army switched to the 226 or another modern pistol, that is probably what I would go with just for that consistency.
Its virtually impossible to own just one handgun. I had the same thought years ago about owning just one. I started with one and now Im up to 5 and counting.
The Beretta is aluminum.



























