First handgun; Pistol or Revolver

WRH

CGN frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
30   0   0
Location
Windsor
As I wait for the government to send my R prefix, I've been checking out various handguns and I'm focused on two, the M&P9 (Carry and Range), and the Model 686. I really can't decide which one I want to start off with. I will eventually buy both, but the second one will have to wait a while. I realize the 9mm will be cheaper to feed, but a double action revolver just calls to me.

So, which one would you recommend for a first purchase? Pistol or Revolver, and why?
 
Revolver or pistol - doesn't really matter if You are dedicted to learn handgun shooting.
What matters is the time that You can spend on the range and repetition/correction/repetition/correction....and so on.
That is much easier to accomplish with 22 lr handgun.
 
Revolver or pistol - doesn't really matter if You are dedicted to learn handgun shooting.
What matters is the time that You can spend on the range and repetition/correction/repetition/correction....and so on.
That is much easier to accomplish with 22 lr handgun.
True enough. And IF you get the urge there is always 50 meter "free pistol". The ultimate slowfire, iron sight, rimfire handgun, bullseye competition.

Of course it's dominated by single shot pistols though.
 
I should have mentioned that I have access to a .22LR pistol, enough that I wouldn't bother with one until the situation changes, so it's still between the two I mentioned. I'll check out your thread Sparq, I couldn't find anything when I searched.
 
I just bought a Browning Buckmark Camper Stainless LR .22 for my first handgun. My ATT just came today so Ill soon be off to the range to try it.
 
While I do like wheel guns, if I was going to get one first (which I've done for the second time in my life lol) it would be a pistol before the wheel gun. Just more fun swapping out magazines and sending 10rnds downrange unlike 5 or 6 in a revolver before you have to reload. Just my preference.
 
Although I loved my 686 I had, I can't find good ergonomics on a revolver. Even though I shot it very well, the grip never felt great when shooting full bore 357mag. Semi-auto's have this advantage over revolvers, better ergonomics.
 
Although I loved my 686 I had, I can't find good ergonomics on a revolver. Even though I shot it very well, the grip never felt great when shooting full bore 357mag. Semi-auto's have this advantage over revolvers, better ergonomics.

The thing with the revolver is that it's easy to get a whole new feel by buying new grips that fit the shooter. The shift in how it fills the hand between brands of grips is far more wide than the variety for semi auto pistols.

If you know you'll get both eventually then I'd suggest that you consider the 686 as your first. Why? Because if you learn the basics of trigger control with the DA on a revolver you won't have any trouble at all shooting any sort of semi auto in any mode. So many folks lament on and on about the long and heavy DA trigger on a DA/SA semi auto for the first shot in some competition classes. But if you're good with the DA pull on a revolver then that first DA shot on a semi isn't a big deal at all.
 
My first gun was a SIG P226 with a DAK trigger. If you don't know, it is a type of double action only. I was in the same boat and told by many experienced shooters to get a revolver. The argument was that if I could master the long double action then I could more or less shoot anything well. The SIG DAK trigger is a real nice smooth double action and am very glad I bought it as my first gun. I still have it.
 
My first handfun was a polymer 9mm, then I got my 686 and that is what I am able to shoot most accurately. I would say 686.

Plus side, if you start with that, and you need to save up, it'll be a shorter wait time to get the M&P as it's the more cost effective of the two.
 
I thought some input would make my decision easier, but there are a lot of valid points on both sides. I think I might have to go with the pistol first, as it is a better value in the Carry and Range kit. Thanks for the advice.
 
Ruger makes the Blackhawk Convertable. It shoots 9mm in one cylinder and .38/.357 in the other cylinder. This is a single action revolver but meets both your needs. The SA is slow to load etc but you don't loose the brass like with a auto so in the winter it is better. Comparing revolvers to auto, I shoot the revolver much better than an auto. There is a big difference between a DA trigger pull and the SA pull, which is just touch the trigger and there is a bang. It's your choice of course.
 
Do you reload? Revolver ammo is generally more expensive than 9mm. 9mm can be had for cheaper than it costs to reload it (unless you're casting your own lead). If you reload, there is almost no difference in price between .357 mag and .38 special loads, whereas factory .357 is about 1.5-2x the price of factory .38 (completely arbitrary). I load all my hot and cold loads in .357 brass to avoid the carbon ring at the .38 special case mouth in the chamber (as also I do with my .44 mag).

A revolver allows you to play around with your loads more than a semi-auto, because you don't have to worry about having enough power to cycle a slide. I have a hollow-base wadcutter target load that barely recoils more than a .22, for example. You can certainly load warm to hot for a semi-auto as well, but you're limited as to how much you can cool your loads.

On the flip side of all this, a revolver is much more time-consuming to clean up after a range visit than a semi-auto pistol. The soot gets EVERYWHERE, and you now have 6 chambers to swab out, a cylinder to clean up (inside and out), a barrel, and anywhere else the frame caught some fouling. With a semi, you strip the slide, pull out the barrel, swab it out, and you're pretty much done other than lightly wiping down the outside, mostly around the muzzle area.
 
Best learner handgun is a revolver, IMO. Even if 38 spl ammo is a little more expensive than 9mm, you can dry fire the 686 to your heart's content. You can learn all the basics of handgun shooting without firing a single live shot, that is if you can resist the urge to shoot live. Biggest benefit of learning on a revolver is trigger control, which includes mastery of your trigger finger.

Go slow on the live ammo, and save a bundle. Learn the correct basics early and save the frustration of unlearning bad habits. Find a good instructor to teach you proper grip, stance, trigger control, etc. I have seen many beginners waste tons of ammo simply because they were afraid or ashamed to ask. Lots of beginners/shooters don't even know how to properly grip a handgun.

BTW, checkout Customammo (John or Brad Parsons), site sponsor. They can set you up with 38 spl re-manufactured ammo on the cheap.
 
Last edited:
right now i have a very deep love for the big boy toys (revolvers)so at first i was gunna recomend you get the 686 first.
And i know youll love it but, im recomending you get the M&P first .
my only reason for thinking this way is because its your first hand gun and yur gunna wanna shoot as much as you can, and a 10 mag might be more satisfing .
Like i said, i love the hell out of my revolvers, but they are more geared towards the seasond shooter who want to take nice, well placed, thought out methodical shots, that lambase you targets with some commanding authority (one shot one kill )sort of approach, and then neatly eject your emty brass right in to your range bag to take home and load up again .autos are more tactical,the approach to the shooting sport geard towards lots of shots and quick mag changes ... of coarce you can shoot eny way you want with what ever you decide.
i love both, hope this helps .
 
Myself I have some rather odd preferances that most pistol owners don't usually care for: example 'free pistol' and several revolvers, of primarily S&W, but a few Colts, and one DW, as well as one Ruger Old Army. I have only one 1911 oddly enough!? But if I were to purchase a new to me pistol, I really like the lines and handling of the 9mm Model 92 Beretta in the FS Compact, preferably the Italian version only. I've looked at several 9 milies, and this one appeals to me the most for some unknown reason. I myself would never really trust a Beretta in .40 calibre. But this is based on 'feelings' only. I admit freely though, I've shot a good friend's 9mm S&W M&P Pro variant. And man it's a really nice dinger too!! :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom