FN FS2000: Ok or don't go there...?

zykopat

Regular
Rating - 100%
20   0   0
Location
Qc City
I read a few posts about the FN FS2000, the pros and cons, etc... It seems fine as a range gun and I like the looks of it (well, with some mods). A bullpup would be a nice addition to the black rifle family and right now I'm not looking the Tavor way. Is there a good reason not to get one?

FS2000 owners/former owners are more than welcome!

Thanks guys!
 
good reason to not get one is they are restricted. a large con for me. you used to be able to get them rebarreled to non restricted for pretty much the same price of a new tavor but i dont think that option is available anymore. if you want a non res one then will have to get a used one from someone. you mentioned that this would be a range gun so restricted or non restricted really dosnt matter for you i suppose.
 
I want one! :( I'm broke...and have other things on my "priority list"...

The only cons are:

- only accepts USGI/FNH mags
- mags don't drop free
- charging handle is prone to breaking when HK slapping it
- Expensive
- I don't have one yet.
 
I picked up one of the restricted FS2000's from the EE. If I had to pick a gun to "go to war with", it would not be the FS2000. The AR is just so much better in so many ways (last round bolt hold open, better ergonomics, lighter, speed of stoppage remedies, and most importantly for me: familiarity).
For a fun bullpup range gun that is interesting to play with and a good conversation piece, it fits the bill nicely. FNForum.net has a lot of good information on them from some of the fans.
Some "####":

As it came:
DSC01582.jpg


Now:
DSC01584.jpg
 
I quite like the FS2K

I have a few different bullpup platforms, and I like the FS2k. I would say it's not as robust as the Tavor, but it is more refined. I've had AR's since the good old days when 30 round mags were just that, and the 20" version was non-restricted. I've since abandoned my AR's in favour of bullpups. It was, for me, an easy transition to a type of design that I believe to be superior in both engineering and ergonomics to carbines I've used in the past. I'm physically not that large a person, and I therefore find it easier to shoulder and stay on target for protracted periods of time, a carbine with more weight at the rear, as opposed to being ahead of my dominant hand. The weight, balance, and compact size of the FS2K were quite handy to have on our last hunting trip (wild boar). At the end of the day, my gps indicated just under 20k of slugging and running, and my legs were tired, but I didn't feel it in my upper body...Here's a glamour shot...:D

ng3h1i.jpg


The FS2K is a little thicker than the Tavor, but it isn't noticeable when using the gun. Pictures of the rifle don't do it any justice, you need it in your hands to see how small it is. Mine has been re-barreled to Non-Restricted length, and that is a huge bonus. I purchased my FS2K in the standard platform with the factory optical sight. Doing so allowed me to pay for the re-barrel, and defer the cost of installing a different optic.

Here's a picture of the gun with factory optic, and NR barrel...

rigk9g.jpg


And here's the new glass with the lowest mounts I could put on the rail hidden beneath the optic shroud.

2j3mes7.jpg


If you want to re-barrel the gun, it's going to cost you an extra 600-800 scoots - add glass & mounts and the price is going to get up there... but for me it was worth the expense.

Good luck with your search

Cheers,

M
 
I saw one in person, it is BIG, from certain distances it looks like some kind of star wars gun, personally I don't like the look of the trigger or the gun in general.
 
I want one! :( I'm broke...and have other things on my "priority list"...

The only cons are:

- only accepts USGI/FNH mags
- mags don't drop free
- charging handle is prone to breaking when HK slapping it
- Expensive
- I don't have one yet.

It doesn't take pmags. Meh. LAR ten rounders with pulls on them fit like a glove.

Mags don't drop- true, but I'm not competing or need super speed. With the mags above, it's not a big deal... Fairly quick.

Charging handle... True, but I bought a billet replacement out of the USA. I can slap at will, but i still don't, :)

Expensive... Nice things always are! I paid 3000 for my lightly used non restricted one. Not bad at all. I believe herron arms will still do conversions for around 600.
 
Personal likes and dislikes aside, it is an FN made in Belgium -Good gun and innovative design. You can buy with confidence you are getting a quality firearm.
 
Nice rifle, good accuracy, interesting design & engineering, decent ergonomics. I really really wanted to like it enough to keep it, but in the end I traded it for another Tavor.

Overall I'd recommend it without hesitation though, as I know I'm overly critical and picky about certain aspects that I want in a rifle, and the FS couldn't quite make the cut.

Here's a pic of the two for a comparison...

BullpupTwins.jpg
 
If you could ever own a IWI Tavor, you would part with your Belgium waffle maker in a second i bet.:D

I own both. The FN offers a few advantages over the Tavor, and is considerably more accurate. If I had to choose, I'd loose the Tavor.
 
I'm curious--what are the advantages and if it's more accurate as well, why choose the Tavor?

I said 'loose' the Tavor;)

The FN's ejection system and safety work a bit better I think and are both ambi. The FN's accuracy is excellent for a semi auto, while so far I've been pretty unimpressed with the Tavor.
Overall though, they are both pretty decent systems worthy of keeping in the 'collection'.
 
Rob, which did you like better? Your Type 97 or the FN?
DSC01584.jpg
[/QUOTE]

I truly miss the Type 97. The FN has several advantages over the T97 such as more accessories, easier to access cocking handle, etc. Disadvantages though are the price, weight (not a huge factor as the FN is well balanced), mags don't drop free (but you can at least easily reach the mag release), more delicate components, not as easy to strip, etc.
The T97 just fit in with my other Chinese toys.
 
Back
Top Bottom