For my new X95 ?

ForaFewDollarsMore

ForaFewDollarsMore

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
16   0   0
Location
Ontario
Just picked up a X95 and was looking for some insight. I usually just shot my AR with iron sights here and there over all the years in my firearm journey, so I'm not the most experienced with black rifles. If I shoot, it's handguns, but mostly I just collect.

So what I got so far is a left handed bolt. (I'm a lefty) A bunch of 5/30 PMags. A very cool savvy sniper sling (Don't know what I could possibly do with it, but it's the coolest sling in the world). A weaver riser rail.


I'm thinking of a Bi-Pod. Would a Magpul bipod (looking at one) or another bipod on the front picatinny be a viable option for the range? Does anyone have one or use one? How about the cutlass grip bipod?

As for optics. Right now I'll just use the iron sights but would like to get something decent soon. I'll be shooting indoors at 50 yards.


Optics is a whole other world for me.
Right now I'm thinking about the Mepro M21 Meprolight Self-Powered Reflex Sight, Meprolight RDS Pro V2, maybe in the future a magnifier to go with it. Any recommendations would be great. I'm thinking around the $500 - $1000 range.

Would there be anything else like a Muzzle Brake & Compensator that would be helpful? They sure look nice. A fake suppressor ?

I generally like the rifle in its stock form. From a functionality standpoint and a visual standpoint. The cutlass grip, the forehand, trigger is also good for me. So I doubt I would be changing those parts. Maybe a pistol grip?

Probably going to pick up some LAR Mags also.

Anyways if anyone has some or any advice, it would be much appreciated. Thanks
 
Can't go wrong with the Mepros optics for the tavors they are built for the platform with comfortable cheek wield and height co-witness. I've had their M21, RDS pro v2, their magnifier and a MOR on a x95. Their golden/tritium reticles are nice and clear if you have astigmatism. I have a big preference for the Dot reticle models and not the bulleyes.

M21 - no battery necessary but the reticle wash out in some lights conditions. Can buy a small LED addon to boost it up. It's a good rugged optic but if you want my honest opinion I would rather spend more to get more at that price point.

RDS pro v2 - decent sight with a large viewing window, good lumminosity, runs on AA which is a plus, not as tanky as the M21 but overall more attractive and no blue tint.

Mepro MX3-F - decent magnifier, the glass is clear and the push button is solid. It's a solid piece but it's weight is also noticeable.


In my opinion the x95 is already very smooth shooting and wouldn't need a muzzle brake, the stock flash hidder is good. A pricy but worthy upgrade is the sabra trigger pack to get rid of the mushy trigger.
 
Last edited:
OP, you mention you're only shooting indoors. I'd strongly recommend against a muzzle brake, as the increase in felt muzzle blast can be huge. If you're considering muzzle devices then I'd actually suggest a linear compensator to reduce the felt muzzle blast.

Why do you want a bipod? For accurate supported shooting it seems like Tavor users generally learn to use a balance point resting the magazine on the support surface. For serious accuracy work at the range, front/rear sandbags is the way to go. But maybe you have a specific use for a bipod in mind...

For optics, you could consider an LPVO as an option. Lots of possibilities in your price range, and there are pros and cons to them over RDS/magnifier.
 
I'd stay away from the M21 optic unless you really care about going clone-correct. The Tritium being used for night-time illumination can neither be replaced nor recharged. When that runs out, you'll have a day-time only optic. I'd settle for something more common like an Aimpoint/Eotech/Trijicon. Personally I have a Vortex UH-1 because I'm a fan of Holographics and the warranty.

I'd stay away from LVPO's on the X95. They take up too much real estate on the top rail. I prefer the Red dot+ magnifier alternative. More forgiving eyebox and 3x is plenty considering you're using a bullpup, not a bench rifle. Remember that length of pull isn't adjustable. The only thing you can adjust is how far back/forward you mount your scope.

Bipods are fine to use but remember, bullpups are designed to be compact and maneuverable, not to be sub-moa bench rifles. Manage your expectations. Rail space is limited on the stock handguard, if you intend to use a light/tapeswitch/vertical grip, you might struggle to fit a bipod on there.
 
Not sure for the X95 but I really like the bipod I put on my tar21 , makes benchshooting nice . Mine is on the trigger hand Gaurd and when not in use is not bulky .
I have an Eotech and flip away magnifier (dang aging eyes ) and love the combo .
I’m told you don’t need to enhance the trigger on the x95 , but on my Tar21 the Gisselle Trigger makes a huge difference .
Lots and lots of mags !
I agree with another poster here regarding muzzle breaks , especially if you’re shooting from indoors , the one it comes with is enough .
From one lefty to another , have fun !
 
I have an Elcan Spectre DR on one and a simple red dot on my other. Both are excellent for all my backyard run and gun stuff. I would advise against a muzzle brake. I had an exceptionally good one on mine for a short while before I got sick of the concussion. At the least I would buy one with a blast shield.

The best upgrade available is probably the Geiselle Bow and trigger pack combo. Beyond all that a forward grip and flashlight are all I have bothered with. Switch out the grip and buttpad depending on your taste.
 
I would get an aimpoint with that budget. Mostly everyone here has good advice. Skip the bipod. At the very least upgrade to the Geissele trigger bow. Add a light. I prefer the pistol grip to the cutlass. I also prefer the slim butt pad. A short vertical grip is nice as well.
 
The rifle is heavy, like really heavy for its diminutive size. You'll find that every ounce you attach to it is an unwelcome burden. As you won't be shooting at any distance the irons or perhaps a red dot at most is all you really need.

All the other things are just aesthetics and unnecessary weight. LAR mags are nice for bench shooting as they're near flush with the mag well and therefore no hindrance. The extra 5 rounds is a nice bonus.

The only real upgrade would be a Geissele trigger pack, but good luck finding one. They are few and far between here and lots of people looking for them.
 
Geissele lightning bow (must have)
Geissele super sabra trigger pack (expensive bonus)
Thin butt plate
Reverse style fake suppressor w/linear comp (hard to find)
Currently have a Streamlight TLR1-HL mounted top rail in front of the Mepro w/pressure pad

Optics
Mepro Rds V2 w/3x magnifier (good, fast combo I'm using right now)
Vortex Razor gen 2 1-6x w/high mount (nice, but heavy)
Vortex UHD-1 gen 2 (on my want list)

Whatever Optics you choose, spend the money on clear glass w/ good eye relief. Skip the Strike Eagle. Buy something that's on a high rise, or one you can place on one with ease. Eotech EXPS series is a nice fit but I like the Vortex UHD better, and its less money.

If you are dead set on a bipod, look into the new BLK LBL x95 handguard w/built in bipod. Expensive but premium option that many on Reddit are impressed with.
 
I highly recommend the blk lbl bipod/handguard. Pricey, but awesome. The grip is imo much nicer than the manticore options.

If you get the long version you can c-clamp like an AR, and it makes that 18.6 barrel look much more organic.
 
Before I sold my X95 I switched to the thin buttplate and pistol grip, and would recommend both. Both are factory IWI and both are in the $40-$60 range so won’t break the bank.

I think a red dot / flip magnifier is a coin toss against a quality LPVO with an illuminated reticle. Which is better depends on various factors. I don’t consider weight a big issue with bullpups due to the proximal centre of balance.

Cutlass vs pistol grip: The IDF use both interchangeably but rumour has it they’re moving toward the pistol grip and away from the cutlass. Some reports from the field say the cutlass has a (small) potential design flaw that allows the strong hand to slide up behind the trigger, whereas the pistol grip prevents this by allowing the middle finger to butt up against the trigger guard like on an AR.

It’s never happened to me with the cutlass’ed X95, TAR-21 or Tavor 7, so I don’t see it as a big problem, but apparently it can happen. These pics are from a user on Firearm Blog who illustrates this. Try it first and if it’s not a problem, don’t worry about it.


B1572FFF-7F31-4AD3-98EB-B37799A36EA7.jpg

192421B5-A162-4DE6-B366-EFFB9DBBA5E1.jpg
 

Attachments

  • B1572FFF-7F31-4AD3-98EB-B37799A36EA7.jpg
    B1572FFF-7F31-4AD3-98EB-B37799A36EA7.jpg
    66.3 KB · Views: 254
  • 192421B5-A162-4DE6-B366-EFFB9DBBA5E1.jpg
    192421B5-A162-4DE6-B366-EFFB9DBBA5E1.jpg
    73.1 KB · Views: 252
Thanks for all the replies. Great info to help me.

I just picked up a whole bunch of different mags to try. Some MFT LAR-15 (Polymer). Read some decent reviews on it. Some PMags 5/40 (Just to see), Lancer L5 Advanced Warfighter Mags (In Green and Red). I already have some steel AR Mags and whole bunch of Windowed 5/30 Pmags Gen3. So that's it for my mags to try for now. Would love to find some 5/20 Pmags.

As for Bipod. Yes I wanted to make it easier for bench shooting and just picked up a Fab Defense T-Pod (Thanks Kmeister for bringing it to my attention) Now I get to try a pistol grip and a bipod in one. I'll see how it goes, if I don't like it I can always sell it.

Also ordered the IDF Buttpad. I'm going to test it out. Can't go wrong with trying it out for the price. Might bring the rifle a bit closer to me, and bring out the aesthetics of the rifle out also.

As for the cutlass grip. Yes I can tell from handling the X95 that it has inherent issues with it. Finger/s entering behind the trigger. Slow grip acquisition. Doesn't help I have hands on the smaller side also. There seems to be more pros to having the traditional grip on the X95, but I have to say I just like the look of it. For me personally it really proportions the look of the rifle (not that this is really important). For now I'm going to see how I deal with it. Then maybe a change in the future.

I hear really good things about the Geissele lightning bow/Geissele super sabra trigger pack. I will shoot stock for now and it might be a future upgrade. I watched some youtube videos, and you can see the difference. It seems like night and day. With that said. The trigger doesn't seem all that bad for now.

Blk lbl bipod/handguard. Very interesting option. Very cool how the bipod is seamlessly integrated. Pricey it is.

Now to reply some of my optic thoughts.....
 
Last edited:
Optics. This is becoming a bit difficult and that's even if you can find anything to buy. Huge determining factor is that holographic seem to super impose themselves on the target.
Here are my determining Pro's and cons of the Mepro The RDS pro v2. Rating the best Pro and cons in order from top to bottom.

Mepro The RDS pro v2
Pro's
- It's what the IDF uses. Must be a good reason.
- Large viewing window
- Good for astigmatism (I believe all the holographic sights should be good for astigmatism? )
- Green (Plus bullseyes option). I hear green is the way to go for many reasons. Plus I would prefer it if I can have it.
- Lots of light gathering of the top hood design. Makes it seamless to integrate the sight where you won't even notice it in your entire sight. (hopefully that makes sense)
- Simple AA battery + long life
- Love the design of it.

Con's
- Concerned of the Bulk of the optic
- Hard to find
- Only dot size of 2 MOA. Does this even matter say compared some other options like Vortex UH-1 GEN II with dot size of 1 MOA? For my application.
- Future magnifier is heavy from what I hear.


Vortex UH-1 Gen II
Pro's
- Smaller, more proportional.
- Great reviews on the sight.
- Love the reticle
- Magnifier is less expensive for an future upgrade or a one off purchase.

Con's
- a bit of Tunnel vison
- It's a red reticle. Still haven't fully determined if this is a point of contention for me.


EOTECH HWS EXPS2™ Green
Pro's
- Large Field of view
- Green reticle
- Quick detach
- Hood cover is Rugged and protective

Cons
- Battery life

There is so much more to consider yes and I haven't decided. So many options to consider. I definitely want to make a one time purchase. Also looking at the Holosun HS510C. Cheaper option but not a true holographic from what I've read. I'm probably going to stay away form LPVO's
 
Last edited:
I came to the same conclusion as you did and went with a holographic sight. Ended up with the Eotech HHS 2 package, which includes an EXPS2-2 Sight and G33 Magnifier.
 
6k5e said:
Pros and Cons aside, make sure you get a good look through them in person if possible, especially if you have minor astigmatism. Some of them may starburst far worse than others to your eyes and will make/break the optic for you.
Click to expand...

That might be hard to do as a lot are out of stock, but I will have a look around. I have slight Amblyopia (Lazy Eye) So only 80% vision in my right eye. Hence why I shoot left handed. Dominate eye is Left. I'm curious who would have such optics to actually try in the southern Ontario are?

I actually don't think I would have such a problem with any of these optics, as I haven't ever noticed any issues with it in my life for anything else. Plus these optics are meant to keep both eyes open. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom