Their old and not worth their price tag. Now if someone was to make a new production line I'd be down. Same goes for the k98 but I'm not about to put 450-1000 into a rifle that's as old as the lee enfields are. Sorry to all those millsurp loving folks but I see no upside to owning a ww1 or ww2 rifle that's been heavily used. I'd much prefer a new production rifle with a warrenty and part support.
Wants parts support, but won't buy a Mauser? lmfao
These guns don't need warranties, they've been working fine for the last 100 years and they'll work fine for another 100 years if you just keep it lubed and clean... My Enfield is 1918 dated. 105 years old. Still goes bang every time...