No less rational than the people who pay $25,000 USD for the Purdey I have. Or $25,000 USD for the Lindner Daly 20 ga I have. Should i send you a link to a thread on the gun? I was downplaying the money spent. It's part of a "matched set", one 16 gauge and one 20 gauge. The engraving alone on each gun is in the $12,000 to $15,000 Can and for engraving, that's a deal. Go to the US and check out top engraving costs.
And you are right....there are plenty of good candidates. But across NA the gun of choice for what AR15MEISTER calls, I think correctly, a resto-mod, is a small bore Fox. Not a Parker, Smith Ithaca or Lefever. Not English guns. A Fox. Again and again. Personally I'm knee deep into a resto mod of one (maybe two) pre WW1 Sauers. So I see value in other places. But THE brand name for a resto mod is a Fox small bore. And that trend is not going away.
People who spend more than $4000 cnd for a hunting gun aren't doing it for "rational" reasons. But that doesn't mean their reasons aren't valid or legitimate. We don't all drive a Vega. Some of us drive 'vettes and Jags. Not rational but nothing wrong with it.
Again show me a $6-700 Fox small bore and I'll be trying to buy it.
I never said there was anything wrong with paying whatever one thinks a given gun is worth. Perhaps our difference of opinion stems from my attitude that I should get what I paid for my guns once I've decided to sell or they are sold by my estate. Considering that prices generally rise over time, that's not a particularly high bar. I do have some fine shotguns. And, as I age, I have a greater and greater appreciation for light, well balanced guns. This is pretty much the definition of a well made sub-gauge. I spent decades collecting American SXSs. These days, my tastes tend toward the likes of MacKay Brown. Expensive and rare as cat's teeth - but I'm not rational when it comes to these guns!


















































