FR8 Revisited

I've been wanting one for a while now. Missed out on a mint one a while back in the EE and have been kicking myself ever since. There's some lucky SOB out there.
 
may be

Oh, not sure about that one...the FR7's and 8's were never dumped cheaply, they were always a slightly premium rifle...but I may be wrong.

It was many many years ago. The last one I saw here was obtained that way.It was in the EARLY days of King Sol in T.O. when we could by a new military jeep in a crate and army 500 cc triumphs in a box {$300 bucks or so} You just had to put them together . Late 50's early 60's :eek:
50_stoss_face_tn.jpg
 
I remember King Sol's...I've heard of those crate Triumph 500's and always wished I could have found one...

Now, was the FR7 even available back then? I think not but could be wrong.
 
I'm with the other 'former' owners, but frankly don't miss them at all. I hated the sites, and on my last one there were persistent feeding irregularities. IMHO the coolest looking milsurp ever, but the looks were better than any of the ones I handled and shot.
 
What dont you like about the sights? The 100m V is nice and open for quick close range aquisition and the 2 and 300m are your run of the mill aperature for more precise shots.

I think its quite ingenious.

And its just a standard mauser action so I don't see why there would be feeding irregularities. Must be some defect or something?
 
The "gas tube" is actually a container for a cleaning kit.

The one I have will swallow a no go gage, but sectioned cartridges show no evidence of stretching or potential case separations, even so I do make it a point to never save any of the brass I use in the gun.

I have also found it to be pretty accurate so I have been very happy with it.

You should keep that brass and neck size it when reloading......
 
i prefer the FR7; smoother action, turned down bolt, and feeds better. with my reloads, mine is a slightly warm 30-30.
 
Fr7/fr8

Had`em both hated both of them .KICKED like a mule with mil-surp both developed cracks at the tang,the FR8 started walking thru the wood.
But they are cool looking rifles.
Tornado45
 
I bought one at Centry Arm in montreal for about $65. They had only a few left (maybe 50) and were clearign them out. Wish i had bought more of them.

I took the tube apart trying to figure out what it was. Thanks for the explanation.

I love the sights. The rear sight revolves for a selction of peeps for different ranges. The front sight screws up ond down, to zero for elevation. The post is offset a bit from the threaded section, so that as it turns, it moves left and right, so the wind can be zeroed as well as the elevation.

My son uses it to shoot military condition matches with military ball ammo. It is quite accurate to shoot and handles well. A much nicer rifle to shoot than a #5.

By the way, don't worry about shooting commercial ammo in 7.62 rifles. The pressure limits are actualy about the same. They appear to be different becasue the original 7.62 spec was quoted in CUP wheras the 308 limits are in PSI. Sort of a metric v english issue.

I have been involved in pressure testing both civilian and military ammo at the Canadian gov't facility at Bell's Corners, ottaw and in the IMR lab at Valleyfield, Quebec. Both flavours of ammo tend to run around 55,000 psi with hot lots running around 60,000.

The hottest lot of ammo I ever saw was an IVI 7.62 Lot at 62,000 20 shot average. The second hottest lot was Winchester Supreme 168gr Match at 61,000. These are 20 shot averages. The hottest single round would have been around 66,000 psi.

This issue of pressure limits being the same was mentioned in the NRA magazine The Rifleman about two years ago.
 
Back
Top Bottom