Update-Range report:
After some considerations I got myself a Christmas gift:

Action,fit of parts and general fit is just about perfect for over 100 years old rifle



I loaded 25 rds with 12 Gr of Red Dot and up 0.3 Gr every 5 rds.Case was toped with 165 Gr Lyman boolit.

Result is as follows:

This is a 100yrs target.2 groups 5 shot each above target are from Gras,one on the left is a group from M48A .I used battle sight marked 250 if I remember correctly and here is something I don't understand.Only 10 shots landed on paper,rest went above it into backstop ( some 40-50 ft mountain of dirt
)
I shot one group with M48A loaded with same boolit ,but 13.8 Gr of Red Dot and sights have to be set for 500m ( again ,it might be 400m -I can't remember).
Is barrel length making really so much difference?Why is this rifle shooting so high?
Btw-those battle sights are absolutely the worst sights i have ever used.400m and up are very fine ,maybe too fine for war rifle but 250m are horrible.
After some considerations I got myself a Christmas gift:

Action,fit of parts and general fit is just about perfect for over 100 years old rifle



I loaded 25 rds with 12 Gr of Red Dot and up 0.3 Gr every 5 rds.Case was toped with 165 Gr Lyman boolit.

Result is as follows:

This is a 100yrs target.2 groups 5 shot each above target are from Gras,one on the left is a group from M48A .I used battle sight marked 250 if I remember correctly and here is something I don't understand.Only 10 shots landed on paper,rest went above it into backstop ( some 40-50 ft mountain of dirt
I shot one group with M48A loaded with same boolit ,but 13.8 Gr of Red Dot and sights have to be set for 500m ( again ,it might be 400m -I can't remember).
Is barrel length making really so much difference?Why is this rifle shooting so high?
Btw-those battle sights are absolutely the worst sights i have ever used.400m and up are very fine ,maybe too fine for war rifle but 250m are horrible.