- Location
- Somewhere on the Hudson Bay Coast
What about using Remington's 'Managed Recoil' ammunition (which,as advertized, provides 50% less recoil), say in .308, in a 7 lb bolt-action rifle with a Limbsaver recoil pad?
This would give very light recoil, equivalent to or less than 7mm-08 or 6.5x55 (at about $2.00 a round), in factory ammunition that costs only about $1.00 a round.
Typically, most of the ammunition that we go through in a year is fired at the rifle range. For example, at the range, one might fire 20-40 rounds a day, one or two days a week, for 10 months; whereas, during hunting season, one might only fire one to a few rounds. And, it is only at the range that one perceives the recoil. And increased perceived recoil can significantly reduce accuracy. Thus it is very useful to limit both the recoil and the expense of rifle range shooting.
However, there is another possible advantage of limiting perceived recoil using the Managed Recoil ammunition in .308 at the rifle range: .. you would have the option of switching to regular .308 ammunition during hunting season, again at only about $1.00 a round. The increased energy and flatter trajectory of the regular ammo would be advantageous, and the increased recoil will not be felt during the hunt.
Remington's Managed Recoil.30/06 loads employ a 125 gr cup and core bullet with a muzzle velocity in excess of 3000 fps. Given the potential high impact velocity combined with a relatively fragile bullet, the penetration might not be sufficient to produce the desired effect on moose sized game. A lower velocity combined with a tougher bullet would be better IMHO, if reduced recoil is the focus of the exercise.




















































