Front and Center - The Globe and Mail

As Ottawa irons out details of its proposed assault-rifle ban, new weapons are coming to market....

Wolverine Supplies, one of Canada’s largest independent gun retailers, celebrated Valentine’s Day with a risky product announcement. After a year of research and development, the Manitoba-based gun shop sent an e-mail to customers unveiling its latest innovation, the WS-MCR, a semi-automatic rifle with a pistol grip, AR-15-type magazine and free-floating hand guard.

It is virtually identical to another rifle developed by Wolverine’s founder and in-house designer, John Hipwell, that became one of the best-selling guns in the country. The WS-MCR should be destined for similar fortunes, but for one Howitzer-sized caveat: It is precisely the kind of gun that the Liberal government promised to ban during last fall’s election campaign.

Mr. Hipwell is undeterred.

“We can’t just stop looking for new products and ways to expand just because of some rumours about what might be banned,” said Mr. Hipwell, founder of the store and a prominent member of the country’s firearms retail community. “I still have to live. I still have a mortgage to pay.”

As the Liberal government irons out details of its proposed assault-rifle ban, new models continue to hit the market, sowing greater confusion over what might be banned and when. One gun-control advocate says the government should impose an immediate suspension on new sales of certain semi-automatic rifles like the WS-MCR.

“We’ve asked the government to freeze new sales until new measures are announced and implemented," said Heidi Rathjen, co-ordinator for Poly Remembers, a group launched in the wake of the 1989 École Polytechnique shooting to advocate for increased gun control. “The more of these guns in circulation, the greater the risk to public safety.”

Her comments echo the government’s own sentiments over the past year.

Public Safety Minister Bill Blair’s office has called assault-style rifles “military weapons designed to hunt people, and not animals, in the most efficient manner possible that maximizes the body count at minimum effort.”

During last year’s election campaign, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau characterized his plan to ban and buy back the guns as an urgent public safety measure.

Yet, the rifles continue to sell at a brisk pace, according to retailers, adding to the eventual scope and cost of the proposed buyback program.


Mr. Blair has pegged the number of assault-style rifles in the country at 250,000 with an average cost of $1,500 each, but exact figures are unknown. Many firearms the government considers assault-style rifles are classified as non-restricted long guns under Canada’s firearms law. Law enforcement have been unable to track them since the Conservative government scrapped the long-gun registry in 2012.

Ms. Rathjen says she was given indication that the government would start banning individual models by order in council last December. Now, the timing seems less certain.

“The gun lobby and the gun manufacturers are doing exactly what you would expect – they are trying to sell more guns. That’s good for them. That’s entirely predictable,” she said. “This is where the government needs to step in as soon as possible and not delay with orders in council.”

Mr. Blair’s office remains vague on the scope and timeline, only stating the government remains committed to a prohibition on “military-style assault rifles” twinned with a buyback program, and that a multistep approach would be announced “in the near future.”

To further cloud the issue, the term “military-style assault rifle” is undefined in Canadian law. Many firearms enthusiasts insist it should only apply to military weapons capable of automatic fire, guns that have long been prohibited in Canada. Public Safety Canada, however, has cited a much broader definition used in the United States that describes assault rifles as any magazine-fed, semi-automatic rifle featuring two or more specific military-style characteristics, including a grenade launcher, telescoping or folding stock, pistol grip and bayonet mount.

“For right now, the only information we have is that it’s business as usual,” said Alison De Groot, managing director of the Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association, an industry group representing firearms businesses. “Every business is obviously doing their own risk assessments. But it’s hard to believe that we’re going to go down this road.”

The prospect of a ban has roiled the industry. For 56 per cent of gun businesses, a semi-automatic rifle ban would have “devastating” effects, according to a poll conducted by the CSAAA. But many have rallied around a petition sponsored by Conservative MP Gary Motz calling on the government to abandon the ban. It closed on Feb. 15 with more than 175,000 signatures.

“This government has not defined clearly what they are going to do – how they are going to enforce it, the time frame, anything," said Mr. Hipwell at Wolverine. “In the meantime, we have a legitimate business to run.”


To the actual article --> ht tps://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-as-ottawa-irons-out-details-of-its-proposed-assault-rifle-ban-new/
 
Those evil semi auto rifles that shoot one bullet per trigger pull.

I suspect the old Lee Enfields will be banned too, because I recall my dad telling me a good rifleman could fire them very quickly.
 
So an adjustable stock is a military feature. Who knew that changing one piece of furniture to suit a tiny teen through grown male adult could be so fearful
 
So an adjustable stock is a military feature. Who knew that changing one piece of furniture to suit a tiny teen through grown male adult could be so fearful

no where near as dangerous as "The back thing that goes up"
 
At least there is solid reason for banning the things that go up. They're very dangerous.
 
Those evil semi auto rifles that shoot one bullet per trigger pull.

I suspect the old Lee Enfields will be banned too, because I recall my dad telling me a good rifleman could fire them very quickly.

Next up : Lever Action Rifles.

They are "Manual Semi-Automatics" after all.

I first heard that description from a fella at the Range, who said that this sort of parlance is already in play.

Nothing will be off the Menu for those that seek to ban.
 
Next up : Lever Action Rifles.

They are "Manual Semi-Automatics" after all.

I first heard that description from a fella at the Range, who said that this sort of parlance is already in play.

Nothing will be off the Menu for those that seek to ban.

Laugh2
 
Let the panic buying continue!

Spoke to a gentlemen at the CFO last week. Out of 80 transfers at day (average) that he does, 30 are AR-15's. He said every time Bill Blair opens his mouth the transfers go up and up and up...
 
Seriously why is Heidi still receiving attention from the government or really anybody in terms of gun control? Her opinions are basically worthless.
 
Seriously why is Heidi still receiving attention from the government or really anybody in terms of gun control? Her opinions are basically worthless.

she'll stop recieving it when canada has zero civilian firearms ownership they have one agenda that doesnt stop here
 
Obviously we need the government to circumvent all of our existing laws, and precedents. I like how Heidi wants the government to "step in" and basically do something that would not be legal, to suit her own agenda. Can anybody say "puppet dictator, with her being the power behind the throne."
 
Next up : Lever Action Rifles.

They are "Manual Semi-Automatics" after all.

I first heard that description from a fella at the Range, who said that this sort of parlance is already in play.

Yea, quite a leap but is one of the reasons why we need to get our message out. We always and still do call them repeating rifles, difference is, something has to be actuated to expel and insert another round into the rifle chamber, ie. lever action or bolt action, as opposed to just squeezing and letting go of the trigger.
Please god let common sense and normality come back to Parliament Hill!
 
Manual Semi-Automatics is kind of that bone headed term coined by the "ex military guy" on CNN - Fully Semi-Automatic both of these descriptions make zero sense but will be quoted by people who don't know better and the ones who do but don't care
 
Back
Top Bottom