More interested in what the barrels have marked on them, receiver markings usually do not mean as much as the barrel markings, and can you confrim that the chamber is 5.56 NATO vs .223 Remington.
gadget
Yes, it is confirmed that MC4A6/5 are made to chamber
5.56x45 NATO Ammunition.
Yes, it is confirmed that MC4A6/5 are made to chamber
5.56x45 NATO Ammunition.
how was it confirmed, is it marked on the barrel ?? any pictures of the barrel markings ?
How? They also "confirmed" that it was "mil-spec", which is pretty much a marketing term these days and really means jack.
How? They also "confirmed" that it was "mil-spec", which is pretty much a marketing term these days and really means jack.
Maybe you missed this the first time?
What they say and claim doesn't mean a thing. Companies exagerate, mislead or outright lie to sell their products all the time.
They claim "mil spec" yet the buffer tube looks to me to be commercial diameter.
ETA: Reading my comments I noticed that they may sound harsh. This isn't my intent. What I'm trying to do is reconcile their poorly worded website description with the discrepencies that are showing up in the actual product. You even admit yourself that the barrels are 1/9 instead of the adverstised 1/7, so how do we verify what they claim?
How? They also "confirmed" that it was "mil-spec", which is pretty much a marketing term these days and really means jack.
Thad; use an optical sight on one and leave "au naturel" on the other one you buy.
$$$![]()
I do like the simple look of nothing on top of the I.D. Damn it to hell with the choices



























