The chamber on the military Enfield rifle was enlarged in 1914 for two reasons.
1. To make room for the mud of Flanders fields, meaning the dirty muddy conditions of trench warfare.
2. There was a ammunition scandal going on at the same time about "politics" and "who" was awarded government contracts to make the ammunition for the military. The scandal was caused because some of the manufactures were making ammunition that didn't fit the Enfields chamber "before" the chamber was modified and inlarged.
There was a cover-up about this scandal and the British deflected it off on you Canadians and the Ross rifle as a scape goat.
So one more time, if the OPs reloaded cartridges fit his new chamber he does not have to do anything. If they do not fit due to headspace and the shoulder of the case is causing the problem the loaded cases can have the shoulder bumped back with the case forming die I mentioned before "without" unloading the ammunition.
I keep hearing the words "full length" resizing when the term "minimum" shoulder bump should be used. The Winchester case below was full length resized twice and if it have been fired again it would have had a case head separation. This same case stretched .011 after two firings and almost came apart and the headspace of this rifle was just under .067. If you are using commercial SAAMI cartridge cases they were never designed to be fired in a fat and long military chamber with resizing dies meant for shorter and skinnier chambers.
Below is what happens to civilian SAAMI .303 British case when fired in a British military chamber.
And the only way to make these cases last is by proper fire forming and letting these cases headspace on there shoulder so they can't stretch.
And it doesn't matter if the case was made to headspaces on the rim or belt, if you use the shoulder of the case and reduce the head clearance the case will not stretch when fired.