I've narrowed it down to a G34 Gen5 MOS vs a SP-01 Shadow (my budget is around $1200); the G34 is $1100 and the Shadow 1 would cost me $900. I understand that they're both completely different guns (e.g. polymer-striker vs metal-DA/SA). Additionally, I acknowledge there was a thread not too long ago comparing the G17 to the Shadow 1 but I feel a G34 warrants a separate discussion. More importantly, I do have more talking points about why I'm looking for suggestions.
I've done what everyone has suggested and went to the local range to try them out. They did not have the G34 so I had to use the G17. NOTE THAT TRYING OUT BOTH THOSE GUNS WAS ONLY THE SECOND TIME I SHOT HANDGUNS. So, I'll be honest with you guys, I didn't feel like one felt better or worse to shoot (especially since I only shot 30 rounds through each); I just had a ton of fun shooting haha. I can say, however, that I was more accurate with the Shadow 1; so I guess that counts for something? Unfortunately, since I tried the G17, I'm wondering if it would feel or shoot different compared to the 17? Some of you may ask why I'm looking at the G34 instead of the G17, and the reason is 1) because I think it looks cooler and 2) I'm a fan of John Wick and he uses it haha.
Anyways, a few factors that have made my decision difficult are:
1. I want to eventually be able to install optics, so I would have to get the Shadow 1 ($900) milled which would mean it would cost around the same as the G34 at around $1100; so I guess we can skip the price and look straight to the comparing the guns. This is why I am not considering the Shadow 2; an OR Shadow 2 would be $1500 and thus $300 over my budget.
2. I want to one day shoot competition such as IPSC, IDPA, and 3 gun. HOWEVER, that day will probably be 3 or 4 years from now because I'm in law school and I doubt I have time to shoot that much. What time I do have to shoot is used up by trap/skeet. So what time I do have for my handguns will just be range toys for now; but again, its nice to have a gun competition ready so I don't have to buy another one down the road.
3. I've been told by a friend that as a new shooter, learning to shoot polymer-striker would be better at first because the lighter and (comparatively) worse trigger would force me to learn better grip and recoil management, while starting straight with something like the Shadow 1 (being heavier with a better trigger) would mask deficiencies with my form. How true is this? I love my friend, but I'm certain he has his biases because I know he prefers polymer-striker guns
I know its a lot to read and answer, but I'd appreciate any suggestions as to what would be a good route to go. Especially if anyone could clarify the Myth vs Fact for the 3rd talking point. Thanks.
I've done what everyone has suggested and went to the local range to try them out. They did not have the G34 so I had to use the G17. NOTE THAT TRYING OUT BOTH THOSE GUNS WAS ONLY THE SECOND TIME I SHOT HANDGUNS. So, I'll be honest with you guys, I didn't feel like one felt better or worse to shoot (especially since I only shot 30 rounds through each); I just had a ton of fun shooting haha. I can say, however, that I was more accurate with the Shadow 1; so I guess that counts for something? Unfortunately, since I tried the G17, I'm wondering if it would feel or shoot different compared to the 17? Some of you may ask why I'm looking at the G34 instead of the G17, and the reason is 1) because I think it looks cooler and 2) I'm a fan of John Wick and he uses it haha.
Anyways, a few factors that have made my decision difficult are:
1. I want to eventually be able to install optics, so I would have to get the Shadow 1 ($900) milled which would mean it would cost around the same as the G34 at around $1100; so I guess we can skip the price and look straight to the comparing the guns. This is why I am not considering the Shadow 2; an OR Shadow 2 would be $1500 and thus $300 over my budget.
2. I want to one day shoot competition such as IPSC, IDPA, and 3 gun. HOWEVER, that day will probably be 3 or 4 years from now because I'm in law school and I doubt I have time to shoot that much. What time I do have to shoot is used up by trap/skeet. So what time I do have for my handguns will just be range toys for now; but again, its nice to have a gun competition ready so I don't have to buy another one down the road.
3. I've been told by a friend that as a new shooter, learning to shoot polymer-striker would be better at first because the lighter and (comparatively) worse trigger would force me to learn better grip and recoil management, while starting straight with something like the Shadow 1 (being heavier with a better trigger) would mask deficiencies with my form. How true is this? I love my friend, but I'm certain he has his biases because I know he prefers polymer-striker guns
I know its a lot to read and answer, but I'd appreciate any suggestions as to what would be a good route to go. Especially if anyone could clarify the Myth vs Fact for the 3rd talking point. Thanks.


















































