G36 Ruger

Frozen Snake

Frozen Snake

Regular
Rating - 100%
21   0   0
Location
49°29'28" N 119°35'19" W
Well Here was a pet Project from a friend of mine. He gutted an Airsoft G36 rifle and mocked it up in his Ruger 10/22. With a couple hours labour he has a fully functional ruger G36. The gun works flawless. very fun to shoot and it has a nice feel. Looking forward to seeing the pro mag version in the future.




SSPX0014.jpg



SSPX0016.jpg
 
I love it!
Looks like it would be under 26" if you folded that stock though.

Maybe a slightly longer barrel (16" maybe?) would get him over that magic number.

Or just pin the stock open......
 
Frozen Snake said:
Yeah He pinned the back side of the stock then liquid nailed it in the open position. If someone tries to fold it, the plastic will break ruining a perfect conversion. He figured better safe then sorry.
Click to expand...

he also could've left the full length barrel on his 10/22 and cover it up with a fake can to make it look tacticool and avoid messing with the stock.
 
mrpenguin said:
Wonder if it would have been cheaper to buy the Promag rather ;) ... when it comes out :(
Click to expand...

I hear that the promag feels cheap in hand. If it was me, i'd spend the same money on a nylon fiber airsoft gun and do the conversion myself. (they are actually made of a polymer very similar to the real g36).

Now i saw this guy from the U.S. who made the same kind of conversion, but with a mossberg 702 plinkster. the conversion was very clean, but because he wanted to keep the original g36 triggerguard on the airsoft body, he had to cut-off the triggerguard from the mossberg with a dremel.

My question is : would it be legal in Canada to do the same? is there a law against cutting off the triggerguard of a firearm if you end up fitting the gun in a stock that has one?
 
Eric_911 said:
Why would it be illegal?
Click to expand...

Well, i personnally don't see why, but given our very smart and very logical legislators, I could see them saying that it is altering the firearm and that it is less safe and blah blah blah....So i'm simply doublechecking, in case there would be yet another stupid law preventing one from doing such a thing.

Why would it be illegal to have capacity restrictions on magazines? and yet there are :rolleyes:
 
He registered the ruger with a description of the Airsoft chassis being a g36 and fitted on the ruger 10/22 with the shorter Dlask barrel. Nothing was ever said again about it. I believe the airsoft chassis was about $100 out of a broken rifle. Maybe because the G36 was not considered a firearm. He even notched the stock on the serial side of the chassis. I was the one who told him to register the changes. This way if it ever gets looked up they will see the description matches the rifle on the certificate in the database.
 
Last edited:
good ideas about registering the mods.

I ask all this because i,ve been gathering for a couple weeks now all the necessary material to build my very own .22 G36c. I spent a little extra money and got a nylon fiber airsoft shell, which is even closer to the real polymer used for the real g36. I also went for a mossberg plinkster instead of the 10/22, as it is not as wide and apparently a better fit for the g36 body. conversions i've seen on the web done with the mossberg also seemed to be "cleaner". let alone the fact that the plinkster is over 100$ cheaper.

The only thing i'm waiting for is my .22 thats in the mail. Pics to follow when my project is done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom