Hard to say. All the real moves most likely happen behind closed doors. Everything else is just fluff and PR.
I'd love to see historical pieces preserved by people who will not only take care of them, but will ensure that they will be around for generations to come. Destroying weapons to make the "UN happy" seems a bit pointless, considering they don't seem to have any real stopping power in world affairs.
These "historical pieces" are still quite effective combat weapons and they don't want them in the hands of people. Think about the day where the UN would rule the world, no more countries, no more borders and autonomous governments and in that world, theoretically, there would be no need for weapons. Some see that as an absolute tyranny and some will see it as a utopia and you wouldn't want those who see as a tyranny have a chance to fight back.
Now all of that might seem a bit far fetched and the official reasoning is that these weapons are finding their into conflicts in troubled regions of the world. And if preserving history is the concern, we can preserve them in museums. To cut the long story short, they have proposed to destroy all medical syringes to abolish heroin addiction. I find that utterly idiotic, and they're not idiotic, they just have a different agenda than what they put out for the public.




















































