I've noticed that there is a fair amount of unanimity about getting an instructor to help learn. I have no quarrel with that view, but it is not the first thing I would do. Maybe I'm just idiosyncratic, (OK, I am idiosyncratic and I like to do things myself! Thought I would save you some time there.), but I would read, shoot and try changing things a bit before getting an instructor, especially if one is experienced with firearms. We all might differ in how long we would wait before approaching a teacher, of course. As has been pointed out many times before, one worry is that one can develop bad habits to overcome if learning too much on their own. But a bit of reading would make it easier to understand and to appreciate what the teacher is telling you, and a bit of trying will help motivate learning and demonstrate willingness to learn. With a good teacher, who will assess how much the student knows and what attitude he/she has, I would predict that lessons would go more quickly and effectively with this approach. It's nice for a teacher if he/she doesn't have to re-invent the wheel all the time, and it is a pleasure for both people if success comes with a good pace because the student is actively engaged with what he or she is doing. Is there really any excuse for approaching an instructor who, after all, has paid his or her dues in effort and research many times over, without knowing what aim points are recommended and so on? Just my $0.02...
fred
Sorry man ya lost me.