I got out to the range to compare my (new to me) Glock 17s (Gen 3.5 and Gen 4) yesterday.
I managed to shoot consistent 3-inch 10-shot groups at 25 m with both pistols, with the Gen 4 shooting consistently 3-inches from centre to the 9 O'Clock position and the Gen 3.5 shooting consistently 3-inches from centre to the 10:30 position. I was using 147 gr Winchester BEB and both guns shot completely reliably and I didn't get any FTF. I did however get one failure to chamber, which I believe was caused by half assed 10th round mag loading on my part in my 10/10 mag (the unreliable BEB bullet shape probably didn't help either).
Here's my take on some observed differences:
- The grip on the Gen 3.5 wasn't quite as aggressive as the Gen 4. The Gen 4 bit into my hand more and felt like it stuck better.
- I could swap out the grip size on the Gen 4 to a larger grip. This made shooting much more comfortable and gave my support hand much more contact with the grip (I have large hands).
- The Gen 3.5 has slightly more perceived recoil. Yeah, it's minor and it didn't affect the group size at all, but it definitely exists.
- The mag release was actually reachable without changing my strong hand grip position on the Gen 4 (even with the larger grip).
Other than that, both pistols functioned basically identical.
So, to sum it up, I'd give a slight edge to the Gen 4. Less recoil, better grip bite, and exchangable grip sizes. Now I'm left wondering if I should bother to keep the Gen 3.5 or just sell it and invest in some 9mm reloading hardware?
I managed to shoot consistent 3-inch 10-shot groups at 25 m with both pistols, with the Gen 4 shooting consistently 3-inches from centre to the 9 O'Clock position and the Gen 3.5 shooting consistently 3-inches from centre to the 10:30 position. I was using 147 gr Winchester BEB and both guns shot completely reliably and I didn't get any FTF. I did however get one failure to chamber, which I believe was caused by half assed 10th round mag loading on my part in my 10/10 mag (the unreliable BEB bullet shape probably didn't help either).
Here's my take on some observed differences:
- The grip on the Gen 3.5 wasn't quite as aggressive as the Gen 4. The Gen 4 bit into my hand more and felt like it stuck better.
- I could swap out the grip size on the Gen 4 to a larger grip. This made shooting much more comfortable and gave my support hand much more contact with the grip (I have large hands).
- The Gen 3.5 has slightly more perceived recoil. Yeah, it's minor and it didn't affect the group size at all, but it definitely exists.
- The mag release was actually reachable without changing my strong hand grip position on the Gen 4 (even with the larger grip).
Other than that, both pistols functioned basically identical.
So, to sum it up, I'd give a slight edge to the Gen 4. Less recoil, better grip bite, and exchangable grip sizes. Now I'm left wondering if I should bother to keep the Gen 3.5 or just sell it and invest in some 9mm reloading hardware?


















































