Glock & 1911 Dropped from a 20 Story Tower: Which One Survived?

Youzawhale said:
You sound frustrated by a stranger online who is a fellow gun nut, can afford ruining a pistol as a business expense to make a video hundreds of thousands of people will watch with interest, and making money with it. That frustrates you enough to tell everyone here how you feel.
Now you are trying to insult me. You're gonna have to do much much better than try to guess which generation I am.

Tell us more!
Click to expand...
You started our interaction here when you jumped in to insult me by saying I must be retarded for watching the retarded video. BTW, I think most of this person's reviews are just above worthless but I didn't ridicule or insult anyone here, unlike yourself.

If you're going to be so sensitive you might think of not starting what you can't finish.
 
jethunter said:
You started our interaction here when you jumped in to insult me by saying I must be retarded for watching the retarded video. BTW, I think most of this person's reviews are just above worthless but I didn't ridicule or insult anyone here, unlike yourself.

If you're going to be so sensitive you might think of not starting what you can't finish.
Click to expand...
Where did I say you must be retarded?
You're reading things that dont exist. You clearly misunderstood what I was saying.
I did question if it made sense that you'd call him retarded after laying out the monetization specs of his channels and how he's having fun.
I stated you watched the video, meaning he caught your attention, pointing out he's achieving exactly what he set out to do.
I do not think you're retarded for watching the video because unlike you, I dont think the video is retarded. I found it interesting and it satisfied my curiosity. Good entertainment.

But do you feel you've unleashed enough cyber frustration and alpha domination to win your imaginary internet title yet?
I must be too retarded or too beta to get on the same vibe as you. I'll follow more of your posts and hopefully you can coach me into the righteous path.
 
Last edited:
Youzawhale said:
Where did I say you must be retarded?
You're reading things that dont exist. You clearly misunderstood what I was saying.
I did question if it made sense that you'd call him retarded after laying out the monetization specs of his channels and how he's having fun.
I stated you watched the video, meaning he caught your attention, pointing out he's achieving exactly what he set out to do.
I do not think you're retarded for watching the video because unlike you, I dont think the video is retarded. I found it interesting and it satisfied my curiosity. Good entertainment.

But do you feel you've unleashed enough cyber frustration and alpha domination to win your imaginary internet title yet?
I must be too retarded or too beta to get on the same vibe as you. I'll follow more of your posts and hopefully you can coach me into the righteous path.
Click to expand...
Cool down bud, nobody should care that much. I think the video is stupid clickbait but you could put me on ignore if you feel that saying so is being insensitive to your feelings. That's how franktank handles these things.

You started this by saying if the video is retarded then what does it say about you for watching it. Remember? You called me retarded because I watched a video and dared to say i didn't like it. You assumed you could play the internet warrior and that I would gaf.
 
Last edited:
NAA said:
It could be said, of a true gunnut, doing that could evoke those kind of feelings. :p

------------
NAA.
Click to expand...
If not embracing this extreme ideology means I’m not a true gun enthusiast, so be it after all, it’s just plastic and metal, and it can always be manufactured.
 
jethunter said:
Cool down bud, nobody should care that much. I think the video is stupid clickbait but you could put me on ignore if you feel that saying so is being insensitive to your feelings. That's how franktank handles these things.

You started this by saying if the video is retarded then what does it say about you for watching it. Remember? You called me retarded because I watched a video and dared to say i didn't like it. You assumed you could play the internet warrior and that I would gaf.
Click to expand...
I never said that. I tried explaining my statement to you again because you seem to have misunderstood it, but you wont listen apparently.
I'll try once more ; I did not call you retarded for watching the video.
Do you really need me to quote myself and anotate each line with an explanation on the intended meaning?

You can make up sentences I never typed as many times as you want, but it wont make it real.

You're a real lion jethunter. Everyone looks up to your internet strength now.
I would never dare put you on my ignore list, I look up to your wisdom too much.
Consuming your commentary is almost like swallowing the Limitless pill.

You should coach youtubers into making better videos, you'd be rich and you'd improve everyone's feed!
Of course I don't need to tell you that, you already know your worth. My appologies.
 
Last edited:
Youzawhale said:
I never said that. My words were very clear. I tried explaining them to you again because you seem unable to comprehend them, you wont listen.
I'll try once more ; I did not call you retarded for watching the video. Do you really need me to quote myself and anotate each line with an explanation on the intended meaning? Or can you figure it out on your own?

You made up a phrase I never typed. Litterally.

You're a real lion jethunter. Everyone looks up to your internet strength now.
Click to expand...
lol, are you making this up? At least you didn't take an hour and write a novel this time, and i call that progress.

It is 100% true that i did not "literally" quote your exact phrase and it's very lawyerly of you to try to get away with it by using that technicality and hoping it wouldn't be noticed. What you actually said was "You both watched the video. Who's retarded again?" Yes, spaces were left out but it is literally what you wrote. :)

If you now claim it was a mistake - i already told you i don't gaf. The best advice I can give is don't write stupid things if you are hurt by being called out for writing stupid things.
 
Last edited:
jethunter said:
lol, are you making this up? At least you didn't take an hour and write a novel this time, and i call that progress.

It is 100% true that i did not "literally" quote your exact phrase and it's very lawyerly of you to try to get away with it by using that technicality and hoping it wouldn't be noticed. What you actually said was "You both watched the video. Who's retarded again?" Yes, spaces were left out but it is literally what you wrote. :)

If you now claim it was a mistake - i already told you i don't gaf. The best advice I can give is don't write stupid things if you are hurt by being called out for writing stupid things.
Click to expand...
Oh... you're under the impression I was hurt by something you said at somepoint along the way?
LOL..thats pretty funny. I'm starting to really wonder just how your cerebral matter manages the information after your eyes have scanned the words. Its puzzling to see the wide disconnect.

I guess you really do need the annotation.

Alright, here we go;

After you called the youtuber's actions retarded, I listed things to put in light what his channel generates.
The first being the money.
The second being the fun he has.
The third being your attention, by noting that both you and the other guy who think the video is retarded in fact did watch it.

then I asked "who's retarded again?" - a rhetorical question to make the point that he is not what you accuse him of being, since he's getting exactly what he's after : money and attention, the latter being the guarantor of the former.

I can't call you retarded for watching a video and a youtuber....while i'm trying to make the case to you the video and youtuber aren't as retarded as you perceive them to be. Did you miss the part where I said I myself watched the video and enjoyed it? Lol good grief....

This guy is on another level...
Bye lion, keep impressing everyone.
You can be certain that your next reply will guarantee you today's internet win!
I promise I wont answer and you can proudly climb on the podium..or something.
:ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
franktank said:
If not embracing this extreme ideology means I’m not a true gun enthusiast, so be it after all, it’s just plastic and metal, and it can always be manufactured.
Click to expand...
I'd much rather view a video of someone bringing a 'trashed' pistol back to usable life than someone who 'trashes' perfectly serviceable pistol(s) for the sake of clickbait & internet generated revenue. At least the restorer is actually doing something interesting of value.


-------------
NAA.
 
NAA said:
I'd much rather view a video of someone bringing a 'trashed' pistol back to usable life than someone who 'trashes' perfectly serviceable pistol(s) for the sake of clickbait & internet generated revenue. At least the restorer is actually doing something interesting of value.


-------------
NAA.
Click to expand...
Great topic for a new thread 🙂
 
Youzawhale said:
The third being your attention, by noting that both you and the other guy who think the video is retarded in fact did watch it.
Click to expand...
Presuming I'm the 'other guy'.... I didn't actually watch the video & still haven't. No need. Saw the vid title & that was enough not to click.

But I do support the notion that "deliberately damaging working firearms to get views on Youtube" is stupid. 100%.

It's not interesting or educational & serves no useful purpose. There you go. :p

------------
NAA.
 
Youzawhale said:
Oh... you're under the impression I was hurt by something you said at somepoint along the way?
LOL..thats pretty funny. I'm starting to really wonder just how your cerebral matter manages the information after your eyes have scanned the words. Its puzzling to see the wide disconnect.

I guess you really do need the annotation.

Alright, here we go;

After you called the youtuber's actions retarded, I listed things to put in light what his channel generates.
The first being the money.
The second being the fun he has.
The third being your attention, by noting that both you and the other guy who think the video is retarded in fact did watch it.

then I asked "who's retarded again?" - a rhetorical question to make the point that he is not what you accuse him of being, since he's getting exactly what he's after : money and attention, the latter being the guarantor of the former.

I can't call you retarded for watching a video and a youtuber....while i'm trying to make the case to you the video and youtuber aren't as retarded as you perceive them to be. Did you miss the part where I said I myself watched the video and enjoyed it? Lol good grief....

This guy is on another level...
Bye lion, keep impressing everyone.
You can be certain that your next reply will guarantee you today's internet win!
I promise I wont answer and you can proudly climb on the podium..or something.
:ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
LOL, there is no "win" here, warrior guy. This is an off-topics forum and nothing here matters for crap. You will never have the horsepower to change my opinion or limit my ability to express it, but feel free to try if you enjoy doing so. I like to make people happy. :)

Keep in mind you are the guy who initiated this because you didn't like my opinion. And you "literally" did call me retarded but I'll accept your explanation that it was a writing mistake and not intentional.

I called the video retarded, meaning the clickbait concept of throwing guns out windows, not the youtuber. I don't think an OnlyFans model is necessarily retarded but that doesn't mean I need to applaud what they do. Clickbait and pourn aren't so much different in concept.

If you want to answer, then do so. If not, don't. Either way is fine with me.
 
Last edited:
NAA said:
Presuming I'm the 'other guy'.... I didn't actually watch the video & still haven't. No need. Saw the vid title & that was enough not to click.

But I do support the notion that "deliberately damaging working firearms to get views on Youtube" is stupid. 100%.

It's not interesting or educational & serves no useful purpose. There you go. :p

------------
NAA.
Click to expand...
to you perhaps.
I guarantee there's a soy boy community out there who thinks damaging paper targets with bullets is not any of those things either, as well as wasteful of metal and trees.
Yet I'm sure you'd easily argue against that, something that would probably be along the lines of what I'm writing now.
For every hobby out there, there's someone willing to call it wasteful and stupid. The vast majority of people taking such a stance are hypocritical in one way or another, if we were to disect their own lives and hobbies.

Not everything has to be 100% a useful purpose.
Sometimes things are done for pure entertainment or mere desire.
The few hundred bucks worth of gun he damaged was a mere business expense to generate revenue and traffic. And fun.
 
Last edited:
Youzawhale said:
to you perhaps.
I guarantee there's a soy boy community out there who thinks damaging paper targets with bullets is not any of those things either, as well as wasteful of metal and trees.
Yet I'm sure you'd easily argue against that, something that would probably be along the lines of what I'm writing now.
For every hobby out there, there's someone willing to call it wasteful and stupid. The vast majority of people taking such a stance are hypocritical in one way or another, if we were to disect their own lives and hobbies.

Not everything has to be 100% a useful purpose.
Sometimes things are done for pure entertainment or mere desire.
The few hundred bucks worth of gun he damaged was a mere business expense to generate revenue and traffic. And fun.
Click to expand...
Very well said! I checked the comment section, everyone had a good laugh, and I couldn’t find a single negative comment.
 
NAA said:
Presuming I'm the 'other guy'.... I didn't actually watch the video & still haven't. No need. Saw the vid title & that was enough not to click.

But I do support the notion that "deliberately damaging working firearms to get views on Youtube" is stupid. 100%.

It's not interesting or educational & serves no useful purpose. There you go. :p

------------
NAA.
Click to expand...
It's like the mag dump destruction videos. Serves no real useful purpose. Most of the guns they do tests on are not designed for sustained fire.

The gun may withstood 20 story fall, but the owner wouldn't.
 
Youzawhale said:
to you perhaps.
I guarantee there's a soy boy community out there who thinks damaging paper targets with bullets is not any of those things either, as well as wasteful of metal and trees.
Yet I'm sure you'd easily argue against that, something that would probably be along the lines of what I'm writing now.
For every hobby out there, there's someone willing to call it wasteful and stupid. The vast majority of people taking such a stance are hypocritical in one way or another, if we were to disect their own lives and hobbies.

Not everything has to be 100% a useful purpose.
Sometimes things are done for pure entertainment or mere desire.
The few hundred bucks worth of gun he damaged was a mere business expense to generate revenue and traffic. And fun.
Click to expand...
You cannot cry that you were insulted when you orginally called people retarded, now using soy boys.

Get your point across without insults and maybe people will take you seriously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom