New Camper
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Lurking in the woods near SFRC.
I finally went over to the dark side, but that doesn't mean I abandoned my blued or stainless/wood beauties. Actually I went over to the dark side a couple years back with a Walther... but anyway had to try THE black pistol. And what I found appears to be unique unless such findings are glossed over.
I like the dark side except for a few things: The stock magazines do not fall clear of the magazine well, and even seem to bind more with ten rounds stuffed in them: Is this an anomaly? I understand that they can't be entirely made of steel as this will eat the synthetic mag release. Far as I can reason, this is a serious shortcoming by Glock: Make the release out of steel, and the mags (entirely) as the thicker steel portion (as opposed to stock steel/plastic laminate) will never bulge and always fall as required. One of the mags that came with the pistol always has failures with the first 1-3 rounds fired: The second mag is flawless. Is there a remedy to either of these problems?
Those things aside, I've only fired 100rounds through this pistol and the virtues otherwise are very appealing: A very accurate service pistol, reliable (with the one magazine) and on account of the design, for a light pistol in 45acp the recoil is very timid and follow up shots are quick and easy. With some more practice, I expect it will be at par with my Beretta.
I didn't find it troublesome to accustom to the stacking in the Glock striker system. Objectively again: Walther has a very smooth, non-stacking striker in their PPX model that Glock could learn from, but I'm not picky there as I do enjoy DA shooting revolvers.
Until I can resolve the magazine issue, my Beretta 92 will always be first choice for an action match: It has non of the problems mentioned and in >3000rounds has performed without fault using OEM mags and aftermarket. Sorry Vader...
I like the dark side except for a few things: The stock magazines do not fall clear of the magazine well, and even seem to bind more with ten rounds stuffed in them: Is this an anomaly? I understand that they can't be entirely made of steel as this will eat the synthetic mag release. Far as I can reason, this is a serious shortcoming by Glock: Make the release out of steel, and the mags (entirely) as the thicker steel portion (as opposed to stock steel/plastic laminate) will never bulge and always fall as required. One of the mags that came with the pistol always has failures with the first 1-3 rounds fired: The second mag is flawless. Is there a remedy to either of these problems?
Those things aside, I've only fired 100rounds through this pistol and the virtues otherwise are very appealing: A very accurate service pistol, reliable (with the one magazine) and on account of the design, for a light pistol in 45acp the recoil is very timid and follow up shots are quick and easy. With some more practice, I expect it will be at par with my Beretta.
I didn't find it troublesome to accustom to the stacking in the Glock striker system. Objectively again: Walther has a very smooth, non-stacking striker in their PPX model that Glock could learn from, but I'm not picky there as I do enjoy DA shooting revolvers.
Until I can resolve the magazine issue, my Beretta 92 will always be first choice for an action match: It has non of the problems mentioned and in >3000rounds has performed without fault using OEM mags and aftermarket. Sorry Vader...