Did a search and couldn't find anything on this so don't flame me if it was already posted. Here's the vid...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ve0wA_byD34&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ve0wA_byD34&feature=related
Yay, yet more warm and fuzzy engineering re-inventing the wheel.
Hollowpoints work. Get over it.
Is there any reason why the front half of the bullet isn't more aerodynamic? It looks like a flying top hat or something.
Yay, yet more warm and fuzzy engineering re-inventing the wheel.
Hollowpoints work. Get over it.
Designers are always looking for a way to reduce recoil, increase capacity and improve terminal performance. Think of the popular defensive rounds developed in the last 20 years...all of them were designed with this goal in mind...the 45 GAP and 40 S&W are perfect examples. I think innovation is a good thing....
how many hollowpoint rounds can you fit into a magazine...that one holds 21....
Not that it matters here where there is a phobia on high capacity magazines.....
Look at the video and see if you notice what I caught. This is designed to produce hollow point results without hollow points.
I'm all for innovation, but it seems to me that there's been a whole lot of engineering wasted here to design around a political problem.
21 rounds is with extended magazines. You can get the same number of 9mm hollow point bullets into a Glock 17 (again with the extended mag)how many hollowpoint rounds can you fit into a magazine...that one holds 21....
Not that it matters here where there is a phobia on high capacity magazines.....
These projectiles looke like machined brass/bronze/some type of alloy. I bet they're going to ba a bit@h for cost - what, maybe $2-3 per round or thereabouts.
My prediction is "lead balloon". An unteresting attempt at reinventing the wheel, unfortunately this wheel is square. Will it work? Sure probably. Will it be affordable? Probably not...
blake



























