Glockworx Trigger Kit in IPSC Production

Only factory OEM parts are allowed in Production division. Regardless of trigger weight any aftermarket parts will bump you out of production.
 
You can shoot it in Standard if you declare that Division before you start the match.

If you declare Production...and get caught with those parts...you will be bumped to Open.
 
Quigley said:
You can shoot it in Standard if you declare that Division before you start the match.

If you declare Production...and get caught with those parts...you will be bumped to Open.
Click to expand...

Exactly :D Just declare for SD and go for it. A surprising number of people shoot Glocks in both PD and SD and some of them do very well :)

John
 
Glock for standard

I shoot standard division with my Glock 35. Check it out in the "My Glock build" thread in the Pistols and Revolvers section.
 
You will be surprised how many people has aftermarket
parts (internal) in their Glock in Production if you can check everyone
of them. They can get away with it because no one will check them at any
matches (at least any LV1&2) :)
 
Other than by testing the trigger pull weight, how do you determine that a Glockworx kit (other than the Fulcrum trigger - which is aluminum) has been installed?

AFAIK, Glockworx takes stock trigger groups and tweaks them. They also have titanium firing pin/plunger kits.

Not that I'm advocating cheating, but how would the RO running a compliance stage know? More to the point - if the trigger passes the 5lb test, do we really care?
 
1riot1ranger said:
More to the point - if the trigger passes the 5lb test, do we really care?
Click to expand...

I am not Production dude, but I agree.
Shadow is build for competition and in my opinion is a Standard Division pistol, not same shelf like Glock and MPs.
USPSA has simpler rules when it comes to triggers in Production.
 
I shoot a Glock 35 in Standard too just so I can work on the. Short of shaping the grip, adding a comp and an optic there's nothing left that I can do to mine.
I've got all the Zev parts in it that you can think of. Extended tungsten guide rod, connector, spring kit, titanium firing pin safety, solid brass mag well, extended mag release etc.
 
1riot1ranger said:
Not that I'm advocating cheating, but how would the RO running a compliance stage know? More to the point - if the trigger passes the 5lb test, do we really care?
Click to expand...

Well, the last nationals in Alberta and often at other L3 throughout Canada, the guy doing the compliance check has been a certfied Glock Armorer. He'd know.

That said, the guy who would care the most would be the guy who you beat with your non-compliant "production" gun.
I doubt you'd feel very good taking a plaque or trophy or medal over someone who did follow the rules.

Glock parts are cheap; it won't cost you much to go back to legal and you'll feel better beating the other guys in your category, class or division then too.
 
Freedom Ventures said:
Well, the last nationals in Alberta and often at other L3 throughout Canada, the guy doing the compliance check has been a certfied Glock Armorer. He'd know.

That said, the guy who would care the most would be the guy who you beat with your non-compliant "production" gun.
I doubt you'd feel very good taking a plaque or trophy or medal over someone who did follow the rules.

Glock parts are cheap; it won't cost you much to go back to legal and you'll feel better beating the other guys in your category, class or division then too.
Click to expand...

I was just asking for interest. Not trying to stir the pot, but I prefer rules that are enforceable without having to rely on dismantling the pistol or the honesty of the competitor. Did the USPSA guys at the IPSC World Shoot have all stock parts? Ben Stoeger publishes on his website that his trigger is tweaked. I'm not certain he feels bad about his second place finish.

As for my gun, I'm shooting a CZ with all the best OEM parts. For IPSC in Canada this pistol offers a pretty clear apples-to-apples comparison of shooting skill.
 
I would never have thought for a minute you were planning to cheat - we're just discussing the situation.

1riot1ranger said:
I was just asking for interest. Not trying to stir the pot, but I prefer rules that are enforceable without having to rely on dismantling the pistol or the honesty of the competitor. Did the USPSA guys at the IPSC World Shoot have all stock parts? Ben Stoeger publishes on his website that his trigger is tweaked. I'm not certain he feels bad about his second place finish.
Click to expand...
I'll bet 100% the USPSA guys at WS all had factory parts - they wouldn't take the chance of loosing the match over something so trivial. Tweaking is one thing, aftermarket parts - another. You can get caught, and it would suck to get tossed to open, so it's not worth it.

As for my gun, I'm shooting a CZ with all the best OEM parts. For IPSC in Canada this pistol offers a pretty clear apples-to-apples comparison of shooting skill.
Click to expand...
Yep, Sure does - so if you're shooting a clearly superior platform to the tactical tupperware :stirthepot2: (for us non-pro shooters)
Why consider switching and handicapping yourself?
 
Why can't there be an option to ask for a teardown like in racing,have a fee high enough to avoid the tire kickers, we have so many other useless rules pushed on us why not another.
 
Glock_2010 said:
You will be surprised how many people has aftermarket
parts (internal) in their Glock in Production if you can check everyone
of them. They can get away with it because no one will check them at any
matches (at least any LV1&2) :)
Click to expand...

Those people are what I like to call.....CHEATERS.......and are ruining PD :cool:

John
 
John in B.C. said:
Those people are what I like to call.....CHEATERS.......and are ruining PD :cool:

John
Click to expand...

PD was 'ruined' years ago by the 'powers that be' in IPSC when they stubbornly hung on to unenforcable rules.

IMHO, USPSA has its PD rules right (their recent adoption of a minimum trigger pull rule excepted).
 
Aqualung said:
PD was 'ruined' years ago by the 'powers that be' in IPSC when they stubbornly hung on to unenforcable rules.

IMHO, USPSA has its PD rules right (their recent adoption of a minimum trigger pull rule excepted).
Click to expand...

Except that their minimum trigger pull rule has been rescinded and won't now go into effect in 2013 as originally scheduled.

Take Care

Bob
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom