Go nogo gages

I guess I’m not following.
If a .223 wylde nogo don’t close on a .223 wylde chamber, the obviously a 5.56 no go won’t close.
But, shouldn’t the .223 nogo gage close?
 
I’m no expert but here goes...

The cartridge case dimensions are the same between all 3.

The difference in the chambers is primarily in the leade area. 5.56 has a longer leade and different throat angle (why it’s said higher pressure 5.56 ammunition shouldn’t be fired in a .223Rem chamber). .223 Wylde is somewhat of a hybrid of the 2, it has a throat length and angle similar to a 5.56 chamber with the smaller freebore diameter of .223Rem (.224), meant to be accurate with .223Rem ammunition while remaining safe to fire 5.56. This is all going to also depend on the particular reamer being used to manufacture the barrel. The headspace dimension to the datum line of .330 is the same between all of them though.

SAAMI specs for the .223Rem are minimum headspace of 1.4636 and maximum of 1.4736. There are no SAAMI specs for 5.56 NATO.
That being said here is the chart of the headspace gauge sizes straight from Forster, one manufacturer of headspace gauges.

D4FD275F-D607-4863-B61F-DD0D62ED9881.jpg

Personally I use the .223Rem go and no go gauges from Clymer but they are the same dimension as the Forster.
What some guys are using as a “5.56 no-go” is actually the 5.56 max gauge, which is 1.4736 and could still have I would consider excessive headspace for sure especially on a new build, and I would be changing parts if something I assembled was larger than a .223Rem Field gauge (1.4696). This also means that failing a .223Rem no-go (bolt closing on 1.4666) does not mean that your gun is unsafe to shoot, but does mean that you should be doing some more checking and/or swapping bolts if ultimate accuracy is your goal.

Something worth mentioning as well is that headspace checks should be done with the extractor and ejector removed from your bolt, and are easier to do before the barrel is installed in the upper if this is a new build.

Apologizes for the long-winded post but there seems to be a lot of confusion on this forum in regards to headspace especially with all the assembling of these great new NR options on the market.
 

Attachments

  • D4FD275F-D607-4863-B61F-DD0D62ED9881.jpg
    D4FD275F-D607-4863-B61F-DD0D62ED9881.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 176
^^^
Excellent explanation. Thank you for taking the time.
As stated the main difference between 5.56 and 223 is freebore and leade angle, otherwise the chambers are basically the same.
The brass will flow to a certain extent before case separation, think of Ackley Improved chambers, but there is a limit. And on a new bolt and barrel you should be less than the 223 no go and it should not close. If it does close you should measure, or have someone competent do so for you. Doesn't necessarily mean its unsafe to fire but maybe it is a warranty issue if it was a new item.
 
Last edited:
So everyone is using .223 nogo gauges for .223 rem and .223 wylde and 5.56 nogo gauges for 5.56 chamber.
Thanks
 
Last edited:
I use .223rem gauges for all of them. They should all be the same headspace to the same point in the shoulder. The gauges that most people are using as a 5.56 “no-go” is actually a “max” gauge and is the same spec as the Colt military field gauge (1.4736). Never intended to be used on a newly built firearm. I believe the US military no-go 5.56 spec is 1.4706, which would be their maximum for new.
 
So if they’re all the same headspace to the same point in the shoulder, why are there 3 different sets of gauges?

It’s confusing as Fuc... ha ha
 
I am going to assume they are for different purposes depending on the user and the requirements for accuracy, safety and servicability.....but I dont make them so I'm guessing
 
Back
Top Bottom