His presentation of events was, at best, selective and self-serving.
"PHILOSOFRENZY;
"he does so because having lower prices means he gets more sales than his competition, which translates to more money."
I thought we lived in a free market society ?? Am I doing something wrong ??
" "isn't in it for the money" (which, amazingly enough, John has claimed in this thread)."
Well now, lets not get silly here, of course I like making money, if your question is do I need it ?? No I don't, however I do enjoy dealing with most of the folks in the industry...
"As for the prices he posted, keep in mind that he hadn't posted these in advance, "
Why would I have posted them, the pistols had not arrived, I learned a long time ago not to do that....
"with some vague description of "things not working out with the supplier."
I donm't beleive our customers deserve a vague description, as you put it.... They asked honest questions and deserved honest answers....I guess now I will have to apologize for being honest....
"His presentation of events was, at best, selective and self-serving."
I would challenge you on this my friend, If you think I am lying then I will challenge you to put your grand knowledge of events and your money where your mouth is
You put up $5,000. and I will match it, you get to seethe paperwork, if I am lying then you get the money, if on the other hand I am not misrepresenting the facts i will donate my winnngs to a couple of charities I already support, do we have a deal ??
JOHN
John. Let's be reasonable. You're grossly misrepresenting what I've said.
I didn't accuse you of lying. I said that you were presenting the events in a self-serving way. That you can't see the difference is baffling, but let me explain by telling your exact story again, but with a different 'spin' on it.
Supplier: "Yeah, we had a deal, but we had to cancel it when he insisted on being able to sell it cheaper than anyone else was allowed to." You see how this version of the same facts makes you look petulant instead of heroic? It's not about
lying. It's about choosing which facts to share, and the way in which you share them, in a way that makes you look as good as possible.
Next, I didn't say there was anything wrong with being in business for the money. There isn't. But
you claimed otherwise. You said in response to Plinker777:
Plinker:
"I've never met a businessman who was opposed to making money, actually the more the better is the norm. "
You: "
Now you have met one, have you ever compared Marstar pricing to other so called importers ?? I thnk we will all agree that we are better than most, and don't forget our no BS waranty"
I did not claim you should be condemned for being in it for the money--you shouldn't--only that you don't deserve
praise for trying to undersell your competitors--as though it's out of generosity. It isn't. It's a means of making
more money You know this--and now you've
admitted it--but previously, you claimed otherwise.
Finally, I didn't say that you should have posted the prices earlier (only that it wasn't a helpful thing to have done). In fact, I
very specifically said what you should have posted: A brief apology, and a statement that the deal fell through with the supplier.
And that's it. You disagree--which is fine. But this way of stating things would have answered everyone's curiosity
without airing dirty laundry. If your boss asks you why you need a day off, "I have to go to the doctor" will suffice; he doesn't need to know that it's a proctologist.
To sum up: your business ethics aren't in dispute. I've never dealt with you but your reputation is good, as your many supporters here attest. It's the appropriateness of coming on here and bad mouthing your competitors, and your--now
their--supplier. It strikes me as unprofessional. I hope I have made my position clearer.