Just sayin
It won't the Dominion Arms that I tried though, due to the threaded hole in the back of the action being to big.
That's neat - are you able to share how the quick detach works? It looks like a latch on the top of the adapter?
If the issue is the thread size could you just track down a bolt of the correct thread and length and enlarge the hole through the adapter if necessary?
Because this detaches behind the pistol grip, I'm assuming they would measure OAL with the stock removed? Which would limit this to guns with longer barrels.
Hi guys, Just got an 8.5" and finding all of the above info very interesting!
Couple questions...
What is available for a quick detach stock where the pistol grip detaches as well. I'm thinking this would be the way to go as it would be (nearly) impossible to fire without any stock. I'd argue that one till i was blue in the face with any cop.
also, anyone care to share details on how you're making the gun unable to fire while the stock is folded?
Thanks!
I agree this is the way to go. Based on my experience with the tech office I think this is the only option that you'd be able to get approved. Anything else they just stonewall you - I still have not received a written reply to my inquiry. Wish I had the $$ to take the SOB's to court to prove them wrong, or at least a Conservative MP that might be willing to help. But if it detaches in front of the pistol grip it would be hard for them to say it is any more capable of being fired than a factory gun with the stock removed.
I haven't started on a quick detach yet myself, but I think the easiest way would be to bolt an aluminum or steel extension to the back of the receiver, ream out the adapter to sleeve over the extension, cross drill the extension and adapter, and put a quick detach pin through the adapter and extension locking them together. If you get something working please share it with us!
Edit: I was not aware of the MCS. It appears they use something similar to what I described above, a cross pin with some sort of detent to retain it. Perhaps one of our Canadian accessory manufacturers could make something similar? I think existing adapters could be modified to make it cheaper than starting from scratch? I would pay extra for a design like this.