But i'll ask the guy from the co's office about it precisely when he calls. Maybe they do make exceptions for grizzlies or something.
I am curious about guides especially.
But i'll ask the guy from the co's office about it precisely when he calls. Maybe they do make exceptions for grizzlies or something.
QUOTE=Foxer;2132214]I've got a call into the ministry to verify - if they say you're right then i'll appologize and repost it.
If they say I'm right - would you like me to pass your number and the pics you've posted here of that hunt and such on to them so you can discuss it further? After all - no one will care right?
According to one guy i've spoken to there's actually a few laws broken there - and the ministry is QUITE serious about it. But hey - maybe he's wrong.
Seems to me tho that putting a bullet into an animal you don't have a tag for is pretty obviously illegal. As i understand it, the ministry freaks about it now because it would be easy to have people 'sell' tags by charging someone 1000 bucks and then they shoot and you claim they were "just backing you up".
And frankly - it's illegal.You've already said as much
I am curious about guides especially.
If you have a tag, the last guy who shot it cuts his tag. That's the law. If you don't have a tag - you just killed an animal you don't have a tag for. You can imagine how that would be abused, and that's why the ministry actually DOES get bent out of shape about it.
.
Sure, pass them on. See if they have an issue with hunters or guides dispatching wounded game. Remember to clarify that the original person pulling the trigger has a legal tag, and the guide or "backup" hunter is not keeping the animal, etc.
Well we'll see what he says. I'm pretty sure they're not allowed to shoot your animal for you, unless there's a danger. Do some? Probably. Not supposed to bait for bear either in bc, but it happens. Still not legal tho and they can get in a world of hurt for it if they do.
However, putting a wounded animal down if the client cannot finsih the job is the right thing to do, especially if that wounded animal could pose a danger to others.
Fair enough. I'll ask them if it's ok for a person to take a shot at a running animal which another licensed and tagged hunter has fired on without themselves having a tag. If you'd like me to use your case as a specific example i'll pass that info along as well. I should warn you tho, I think you're going to find they don't really care for the idea. If they decide to make an issue out of it, your buddy will lose his bear hide, so before i pass your name along, are you SURE it's perfectly legal and nobody's going to be upset about it?
I'd prefer to keep my friends out of anything that is my responsability.
Although, Who knows how much of the internet is BS?
How do I convince someone with experience to come with me and show me the ropes.
I reposted the griz question in a fresh thread.
Yeah, but if they determine the bear was killed illegally, they'll want the bear. That's why i asked "are you SURE?"
D
My buddy with the tag put a 160gr X bullet through both shoulders, leaving a exit wound I could fit 2 fingers in to . I'm pretty sure it was killed by that.
I imagine they argue something like 'if it was dead, it wouldn't have needed another shot' or the like.
Just to add another twist to this subject. In Yukon for Bison hunting it is encouraged by the co's to have a backup hunter. The backup hunter does NOT need a tag and is allowed to shoot after the person with the tag has made his first shot. As I understand this it is for Bison ONLY. Smokey
Odd - bison but not grizzlies. I wonder what the logic is there.




























