I was just browsing a thread where a member gave the following advice to a new hunter:
"...If you are hunting grouse and you've got a shotgun in your hands, you are obligated as a fair chase hunter to shoot them on the wing...."
My question is where does this ludicrous concept originate? And why is it fairer? And what does fair have to do with anything?
Would 'nt a sure thing gound shot with no meat damage be more ethical then a shot splattered breast and an increased chance of a lost, wounded bird?
I love ruffed grouse above all game and can probably claim as many on the wing as anyone but I also would never pass up a grouse on the ground. Should we also wait until a moose is going full bore through the spruce?
New hunters, please take grouse on the ground, aim appropriately high, clean em immediately, wrap em in bacon and feed them to your loved ones.
only 9 months left till the season opens!
Cheers
"...If you are hunting grouse and you've got a shotgun in your hands, you are obligated as a fair chase hunter to shoot them on the wing...."
My question is where does this ludicrous concept originate? And why is it fairer? And what does fair have to do with anything?
Would 'nt a sure thing gound shot with no meat damage be more ethical then a shot splattered breast and an increased chance of a lost, wounded bird?
I love ruffed grouse above all game and can probably claim as many on the wing as anyone but I also would never pass up a grouse on the ground. Should we also wait until a moose is going full bore through the spruce?
New hunters, please take grouse on the ground, aim appropriately high, clean em immediately, wrap em in bacon and feed them to your loved ones.
only 9 months left till the season opens!
Cheers
Last edited: