Guelph Score Analysis
- Thread starter ckc123
- Start date
Ok, just to go back to scoring/etc for a second, sometime last year, I think, people were discussing the relative merits of speed vs accuracy (I believe someone was saying something like "if you're shooting all As, you're shooting too slowly")...
In Std, the winner got 814 points (these are target points, not stage point)
In Open, it was 848
in Prod it was 801 (4 MIKES
)
in Rev it was 748
given the max number of 985, this means:
Std = 83% of max (avg just a hair above C-C on each target, for Major)
open = 86% of max (just a hair above A-C, C-C for each 2 targets, for Major)
Prod = 81% of max (which is basically avg of A-C on each target, for Minor)
Rev = 75% of max (which is just above C-C, C-D for each 2 targets, for Major)
Ok, so it looks like for this match, the accuracy obtained by the winners was lower than in the matches we looked at last year (I remember the numbers being mostly in the high 80/low 90s I think), so it's clear this match was challening accuracy-wise, and wasn't a hose fest
Good stuff...
In Std, the winner got 814 points (these are target points, not stage point)
In Open, it was 848
in Prod it was 801 (4 MIKES
)in Rev it was 748
given the max number of 985, this means:
Std = 83% of max (avg just a hair above C-C on each target, for Major)
open = 86% of max (just a hair above A-C, C-C for each 2 targets, for Major)
Prod = 81% of max (which is basically avg of A-C on each target, for Minor)
Rev = 75% of max (which is just above C-C, C-D for each 2 targets, for Major)
Ok, so it looks like for this match, the accuracy obtained by the winners was lower than in the matches we looked at last year (I remember the numbers being mostly in the high 80/low 90s I think), so it's clear this match was challening accuracy-wise, and wasn't a hose fest
Good stuff... 
