sharp shooter
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Essex county (Ontario)
Its all about which one your rifle likes. I've had guns that preferred the H over the IMR and other guns that preferred the IMR over the H.
H4350 vs IMR4350, any reason to pick one over the other?
- Thread starter Fox
- Start date
is this not all repackaged AR2209 ish???? or that incorrect?
thinking, AR2208 = Varget .
i think Hodgon re packages the powders so i guess H4350 is 2209.......... an IMR? must be its own stuff? is it look different?
id rekon its all the same stuff from what im gathering
thinking, AR2208 = Varget .
i think Hodgon re packages the powders so i guess H4350 is 2209.......... an IMR? must be its own stuff? is it look different?
id rekon its all the same stuff from what im gathering
Last edited:
periculumnexnecis
CGN Regular
- Location
- Kébecistan
imr 4350 works best in my 30-06 and 300 win mag, tried both, settled with imr.
Lets put it this way either one of those 4350 powders will toss bullets well within minute of moose in any temp your going to hunt in, enough that the moose will not know the difference between them. If you were a 1000 yd. bench rest shooter then you may want to do some serious experimentation between the two.
Personally I have been using IMR 4550 in my 30-06 since the mid 70's in all sorts of temps and ranges without issue or complaints.
Personally I have been using IMR 4550 in my 30-06 since the mid 70's in all sorts of temps and ranges without issue or complaints.
After fighting with IMR4350 to produce a 270 Winchester load using the Nosler 150 grain Partition the switch to H4350 from the Nosler manual produced instant results.
Max load was 52.0 grains and that load produced a 1.40 at 200 m.
The rifle was a Remington 700 Classic.
Max load was 52.0 grains and that load produced a 1.40 at 200 m.
The rifle was a Remington 700 Classic.
