Handgun buy-back if you die?

you will need to have an ATT approved from current storage location to your storage location, then a separate ATT to the range. As we all know, the ATTs are subject to CFO approval. They have approved these in the past. They may balk at this now especially for a business to individual. Within the family, it has a reasonable chance of success.
 
kjohn said:
If Kanada votes these clowns back in, there will be moves to start taxing homeowners on the equity of their legally owned homes, plus simply take part of our legally earned savings. I’m not overly hopeful that just the threat of that will wake voters up.
Click to expand...

There is a growing number of Canadians that believe home ownership is out of reach for anyone but the rich, unfortunately people with this mindset are quickly bcoming the majority of the voters. All this demographic is concerned with is how much money and social programs the government will provide them with to do nothing
 
Many of the people from whom I purchased my handguns are dead and buried.

Others have problems of their own.

None are likely to have any interest in buying back my handguns.
 
whitbyman said:
That's an interesting idea, although CRA might get involved.

I suspect the CRA would want you to file business taxes.
Click to expand...

This is actually not a bad thing. Run the business out of your home and you can claim all kinds of expenses for the business and get a tax break. A business does not have to be profitable. You don’t even need to register for GST/HST unless the business makes more than $30k a year.
 
Leg said:
This is actually not a bad thing. Run the business out of your home and you can claim all kinds of expenses for the business and get a tax break. A business does not have to be profitable. You don’t even need to register for GST/HST unless the business makes more than $30k a year.
Click to expand...

But if you do register, you're eligible for GST/HST rebates on anything that could be related to the business. For example, tools, office supplies, part of your electricity and heating, ammunition (for testing) etc. etc.
 
I seem to recall people on one side arguing that registration did not lead to confiscation, now those same ideologues are offering bribes and compensation to ferret out the unregistered and no compensation is considered or apparently needed for the registered.

It's a bit surprising that they are doing this at the same time and the media and non gun "folk" don't see any issue with it.... we have entered a zombie scenario but it's not quite the Hollywood version yet, just a general sense of mindlessness.
 
Leg said:
This is actually not a bad thing. Run the business out of your home and you can claim all kinds of expenses for the business and get a tax break. A business does not have to be profitable. You don’t even need to register for GST/HST unless the business makes more than $30k a year.
Click to expand...

I don't believe you can run a money losing business for too many years. At least it used to be like that
 
Stop with the "buy back" nonsense! Unless it was purchased from the government ....... they CAN'T buy it "back!" They can "buy" it from you or your estate but this nonsense of "buy back" is just playing into their narrative.
 
While I would go along with traps,the lawyer’s fee’s would be a killer .
There is way more to a gunsmith licence than paying $100.on
Are you really a gunsmith? A lot of govn’t oversight
The licence is a minor detail .
But there are benefits to a business when you are dealing with restricted and prohibited guns.
But will it get you off their hook? Not likely?

And people are taking buy back
I plan on winning the lotto as well
 
kjohn said:
If Kanada votes these clowns back in, there will be moves to start taxing homeowners on the equity of their legally owned homes, plus simply take part of our legally earned savings. I’m not overly hopeful that just the threat of that will wake voters up.

At the moment, a large portion of the voting population doesn’t give a rat’s a$$ about our handguns. They can’t seem to make the connection to their own situation. Until they wake up, we will drift on our own iceberg.

My Dad, who was born in 1900, told me that all the liquor prohibition did was make crooks out of honest people. I can see clearly now how that comes about.
Click to expand...


You think they're going to "wake up" ?
You're more optimistic than i am.
 
coldestcanuck said:
I've looked in the text of the OIC for language to that effect. Haven't seen it. Where is it in the list of exceptions?
Click to expand...

(Sigh) You did? OIC is bringing provisions of c-21 into force.

https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/frrms/c21-en.aspx

Literally the first section titled "businesses"

This comes from the wording of c-21 (linked from the article above)

Find the section "Firearms act"

Handguns
Start of inserted block
12.#2 A registration certificate for a handgun must not be issued to an individual.

_individual_, so by corollary, businesses who are not individuals are ok.

The text of the OIC as linked from the same article talks about individuals extensively. So same conclusions apply (also confirmed by various CFO offices).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom