Hawke Varmint SF any good?

sixty9santa

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
36   0   0
I'm looking to put a dual purpose hunting/target scope on my Remington 597 and I like the features that Hawke has to offer. I was looking at their 3-12x and 4-16x ranges but I simply can't decide. They seem to be well equipped for a 220$ scope and the ten year warranty is attractive as well.
I figured I'd use the low magnification for hunting and low light plinking and the upper end on brighter days for targets at 100 meters.
Sure as heck is harder to find a scope than a gun.
Any and all input is greatly appreciated!
 
My buddy bought one for a centerfire and it was crap. Wouldn't hold zero.

Edit:
On another note, I have a 4-12 Nikon Prostaff w/ BDC reticle that is in that price range, and holds zero very well. I recently sold the rifle it was on so you can have it for $200!
 
I've owned 2 Hawke scopes and have nothing to complain about with either, other than they are a tad bit heavy. I have a Hawke Sidewinder 4.5-14x42 SF on a .223 right now that I bought new at Gagnon when they first brought them in. I'm very happy with it, but it is more pricey than the Varmint SF line. It tracks extremely well and the optics are bright and clear. It has an illuminated reticle as well, even on full brightness there is no light scatter inside the tube.
 
Thanks for the info Hitzy!

I have had a look at them before but I'm looking for an AO (occular but prefer side focus), fine mildot/BDC reticle, illumination would be a bonus, 14x to 16x max magnification, would love a 30mm tube and 40mm to 50mm objective.

Lot to ask for and I do agree that the price is high for made in China. NC Star and Leapers have these offerings at half the price.

I love Nikon but there just isn't enough offered regardless of price.
 
I have a sidewinder with 30mm tube. One hiccup right now sending in for a fix. I think it's a piece of powder coating stuck to inside of glass. Holds zero and passes the box test. I had a Burris and it had 1" tube after a 30mm tube I'm not looking back.
 
I have a dozen of the Varmint SF scopes... they are excellent for that price range... and every one of them holds zero...



 
Thank you for the input Hoytcanon!
I have a bunch of questions for you since I've read mixed things about them.

Are the 4-16x scopes very finicky when it comes to eye relief at higher magnification, ie complete white out?
Are they smooth?
What would you recommend, 3-12x or 4-16x and why?
How are they in low light?
Do you find the half mildot reticle cluttered/thick/defined?
How precise is the side focus?
Do these scopes track reliably and are the clicks positive/mushy?
How do you find the overall quality when compared to Mueller?
What rings are you using in your pics?
 
Last edited:
I have two Hawke Scopes, both Sidewinder 30s' and both are held in place with Weaver Grand Slam rings. I know your looking at the Varmint SF, but thought I'd ad in my findings on the upper lineup so you could compare.

- 3x12-50mm (HK4004) with SR6 IR Recticle mounted on a .243win
- 6x24-56mm (HK4012) with SR12 IR Recticle mounted currently on a .204Ruger (previously on a 22-250)

*note* both of the above recticles are now called the "SR Pro" and thus the above model numbers are obsolete, replaced by one number higher ie; 3x12-50 is now HK4005.

They have lasted 2 seasons of abuse in the field, withstanding sub-zero temps, sleet, snow, rain, drizzle etc. Both track well & haven't had any issues holding zero. Adjustment clicks are positive, the only "mushiness" to them maybe my frozen hands not working after a few stand/sets in frigid temps. Side parallax adjustment is easy to navigate & it's clarity is good. Although i haven't pushed it past 400yrds to test further. I've yet to use the IR feature either at the bench or afield, so I can't comment there.

I prefer the 3x12 over the 6x24, as I find the clarity is a little crisper at full yield. That's not to say it's not clear at 24x, just not as crisp (if that makes any sense). I really haven't run into a scenario while hunting that i needed to push past 16-18x to be honest so i'd take that with a grain of salt.

Of the the recticles, my preference is again the 3x12 w/the SR6. It's just a little less "busy" than the SR12. I find the SR12 Recticle is more cluttered & can be distracting when lining up a target afield. Hawke has recently changed their recticles to a Mil-Dot style which should help alleviate that. On that note, if i utilise the hash marks provided i can hold 200-400 yards without making turret changes easily enough & within M.O.C. (minute of coyote) with either scope. Reassuring in the field, when you don't have time to make adjustments for range/windage.

Hopefully that helps you. If you have any other questions, let me know.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom